Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Seizure First Aid Training For people with Epilepsy (SAFE) frequently attending emergency departments and their significant others: results of a UK multi-centre randomised controlled pilot trial

  • A.J. Noble
  • , D. Snape
  • , S. Nevitt
  • , Emily Holmes
  • , M. Morgan
  • , Catrin Tudur Smith
  • , Dyfrig Hughes
  • , M. Buchanan
  • , J. McVicar
  • , E. MacCallum
  • , Steve Goodacre
  • , L. Rinsdale
  • , A.G. Marson
    • University of Liverpool
    • King's College London
    • Wirral University Teaching Hospital
    • NHS Highland
    • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
    • University of Sheffield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    274 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and optimal design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Seizure First Aid Training For Epilepsy (SAFE).

    DESIGN: Pilot RCT with embedded microcosting.

    SETTING: Three English hospital emergency departments (EDs).

    PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥16 with established epilepsy reporting ≥2 ED visits in the prior 12 months and their significant others (SOs).

    INTERVENTIONS: Patients (and their SOs) were randomly allocated (1:1) to SAFE plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU alone. SAFE is a 4-hour group course.

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two criteria evaluated a definitive RCT's feasibility: (1) ≥20% of eligible patients needed to be consented into the pilot trial; (2) routine data on use of ED over the 12 months postrandomisation needed securing for ≥75%. Other measures included eligibility, ease of obtaining routine data, availability of self-report ED data and comparability, SAFE's effect and intervention cost.

    RESULTS: Of ED attendees with a suspected seizure, 424 (10.6%) patients were eligible; 53 (12.5%) patients and 38 SOs consented. Fifty-one patients (and 37 SOs) were randomised. Routine data on ED use at 12 months were secured for 94.1% patients. Self-report ED data were available for 66.7% patients. Patients reported more visits compared with routine data. Most (76.9%) patients randomised to SAFE received it and no related serious adverse events occurred. ED use at 12 months was lower in the SAFE+TAU arm compared with TAU alone, but not significantly (rate ratio=0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.17). A definitive trial would need ~674 patient participants and ~39 recruitment sites. Obtaining routine data was challenging, taking ~8.5 months.

    CONCLUSIONS: In satisfying only one predetermined 'stop/go' criterion, a definitive RCT is not feasible. The low consent rate in the pilot trial raises concerns about a definitive trial's finding's external validity and means it would be expensive to conduct. Research is required into how to optimise recruitment from the target population.

    TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13871327.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere035516
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2020

    Keywords

    • Epilepsy
    • Accident & Emergency Medicine
    • Organisation of health services
    • Health economics
    • Clinical Trials

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Seizure First Aid Training For people with Epilepsy (SAFE) frequently attending emergency departments and their significant others: results of a UK multi-centre randomised controlled pilot trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this