Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis

  • Emily Peckham
  • , Eirini Karyotaki
  • , Marit Sijbrandij
  • , Marianna Purgato
  • , Ceren Acarturk
  • , Daniel Lakin
  • , Della Bailey
  • , Ersin Uygun
  • , Federico Tedeschi
  • , Johannes Wancata
  • , Jura Augustinavicius
  • , Ken Carswell
  • , Maritta Välimäki
  • , Mark van Ommeren
  • , Markus Kösters
  • , Mariana Popa
  • , Marx Ronald Leku
  • , Minna Anttila
  • , Rachel Churchill
  • , Ross G. White
  • Sarah Al-Hashimi, Tella Lantta, Teresa Au, Thomas Klein, Wietse A Tol, Pim Cuijpers, Pim Cuijpers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

QUESTION: Refugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to examine the effects and moderators of SH+ compared with Enhanced Care as Usual (ECAU) in reducing depressive symptoms among refugees and asylum seekers.

STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three randomised trials were identified with 1795 individual participant data (IPD). We performed an IPD meta-analysis to estimate the effects of SH+, primarily on depressive symptoms and second on post-traumatic stress, well-being, self-identified problems and functioning. Effects were also estimated at 5-6 months postrandomisation (midterm).

FINDINGS: There was no evidence of a difference between SH+ and ECAU+ in reducing depressive symptoms at postintervention. However, SH+ had significantly larger effects among participants who were not employed (β=1.60, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.00) and had lower mental well-being levels (β=0.02, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.05). At midterm, SH+ was significantly more effective than ECAU in improving depressive symptoms (β=-1.13, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.26), self-identified problems (β=-1.56, 95% CI -2.54 to -0.59) and well-being (β=6.22, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.90).

CONCLUSIONS: Although SH+ did not differ significantly from ECAU in reducing symptoms of depression at postintervention, it did present benefits for particularly vulnerable participants (ie, unemployed and with lower mental well-being levels), and benefits were also evident at midterm follow-up. These results are promising for the use of SH+ in the management of depressive symptoms and improvement of well-being and self-identified problems among refugees and asylum seekers.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Mental Health
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Health Behavior
  • Humans
  • Mental Health
  • Psychological Well-Being
  • Refugees/psychology
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this