Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?

James M. Gibbons, Emily Nicholson, E.J. Milner-Gulland, Julia P.G. Jones

Imperial College London

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1218-1226
Journal	Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume	48
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2011

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

Cite this

@article{f103a773e152485a86c31051e909fbb0,

title = "Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?",

author = "Gibbons, {James M.} and Emily Nicholson and E.J. Milner-Gulland and Jones, {Julia P.G.}",

year = "2011",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "1218--1226",

journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",

issn = "1365-2664",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?

AU - Gibbons, James M.

AU - Nicholson, Emily

AU - Milner-Gulland, E.J.

AU - Jones, Julia P.G.

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

M3 - Article

SN - 1365-2664

VL - 48

SP - 1218

EP - 1226

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

IS - 5

ER -