Standalone DBT Group Skills Training Versus Standard (i.e. All Modes) DBT for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Natural Quasi-experiment in Routine Clinical Practice

Jim Lyng, Michaela A Swales, Richard P Hastings, Tracy Millar, Daniel J Duffy, Richard Booth

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2314 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We describe a naturally occurring, real-world comparison of outcomes following 6 months in standalone DBT skills training group for adults with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) without recent suicidal or severe self-harming behaviours and standard (i.e. all modes) DBT for BPD including patients with recent high-risk behaviours. 34 patients chose standalone skills over waiting for standard DBT and 54 were offered standard DBT. Dropout was higher for standalone skills than standard DBT (38.2% vs. 16.7%). No statistically or clinically significant differences were found among completers between conditions on borderline symptoms, general psychopathology, and suicide ideation. There was a moderate effect for standalone skills on hopelessness and emotion regulation difficulties which may have reflected non-equivalence of treatment groups. Significant methodological factors limit generalisability of findings which offer support for feasibility of standalone DBT skills as an effective alternative to waitlist for standard DBT for at least some patients with BPD in the community.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)238-250
    Number of pages13
    JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
    Volume56
    Issue number2
    Early online date31 Oct 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Standalone DBT Group Skills Training Versus Standard (i.e. All Modes) DBT for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Natural Quasi-experiment in Routine Clinical Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this