Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of Standard And New Antiepileptic Drugs (SANAD-II)

  • Silviya Balabanova
  • , Claire Taylor
  • , Graeme Sills
  • , Girvan Burnside
  • , Catrin Plumpton
  • , Phil Smith
  • , Richard Appleton
  • , John Paul Leach
  • , Michael Johnson
  • , Gus A. Baker
  • , Munir Pirmohamed
  • , Dyfrig Hughes
  • , Paula Williamson
  • , Catrin Tudor-Smith
  • , Anthony G. Marson
    • Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
    • University of Glasgow
    • University of Liverpool
    • University Hospital of Wales

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    182 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Introduction: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Over the past 20 years, a number of new drugs have been approved for NHS use on the basis of information from short term trials that demonstrate efficacy. These trials do not provide information about the longer term outcomes, which inform treatment policy. This trial will assess the long term clinical and cost-effectiveness of the newer treatments levetiracetam and zonisamide.
    Methods and analysis: This is a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing new and standard treatments for patients with newly-diagnosed epilepsy. Arm A of the trial randomised 990 patients with focal epilepsy to standard AED lamotrigine or new AEDs levetiracetam or zonisamide. Arm B randomised 520 patients with generalised epilepsy to standard AED sodium valproate or new AED levetiracetam. Patients are recruited from United Kingdom NHS out-patient epilepsy, general neurology and paediatric clinics. Included patients are aged 5 years or older with two or more spontaneous seizures requiring AED monotherapy, who are not previously treated with AEDs. Patients are followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. The primary outcome is time to 12-month remission from seizures. Secondary outcomes include time to treatment failure (including due to inadequate seizure control or due to unacceptable adverse reactions); time to first seizure; time to 24-month remission; adverse reactions and quality of life. All primary analyses will be on an intention to treat basis. Separate analyses will be undertaken for each arm. Health economic analysis will be conducted from the perspective of the NHS to assess the cost-effectiveness of each AED.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere040635
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume10
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Aug 2020

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • clinical trials
    • epilepsy
    • health economics
    • health policy
    • paediatric neurology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of Standard And New Antiepileptic Drugs (SANAD-II)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this