Symptoms, ultrasound imaging and biochemical markers alone or in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in women with symptoms suspicious of ovarian cancer

N. Rai, R. Campaneria, K. Snell, S. Mallett, S.E. Bayliss, R.D. Neal, M. Balogun, S. Kehoe, J.K. Deeks, S. Sundar, C. Davenport

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To establish the accuracy of symptoms, ultrasound and biomarkers alone or in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women. To compare the accuracy of different tests or test combinations. We will investigate the following sources of heterogeneity: Population Clinical setting (generalist/primary care/community/family practice) versus specialist setting (cancer unit/cancer centre/gynaecological oncology) Menopausal status Index tests Test positivity threshold Experience of the ultrasound test operator (general sonographers versus specialist interest) Target condition Histological subtype Study quality Case-control versus other study designs Study quality: for study participants not receiving surgery initially following a negative index test result: 12 months follow-up versus less than 12 months follow-up
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberCD011964
    JournalCochrane Library
    Volume2015
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Dec 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Symptoms, ultrasound imaging and biochemical markers alone or in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in women with symptoms suspicious of ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this