Teaching science skills and knowledge to students with developmental disabilities: A systematic review

  • Magdalena M. Apanasionok
  • , R.P. Hastings
  • , Corinna Grindle
  • , Richard Watkins
  • , Andread Paris

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to identify current practice on teaching science to students with intellectual disability (ID) and/or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in relation to two review questions—students' science outcomes and students' and teachers' experiences of the interventions. Six databases related to education, psychology, and science were systematically searched. A detailed protocol can be viewed on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42017057323). Thirty studies were identified that reported on science interventions and 20 on student/teacher experiences of the interventions. The majority of the studies targeted science vocabulary and concepts. Other targets included inquiry skills and comprehension skills. The majority of the interventions used components of systematic instruction (n = 23). Five studies focused on self-directed learning and two on comprehension-based instruction. Students and teachers reported positive experiences of the interventions. The findings suggest that components of systematic instruction in particular might be effective in teaching science content to students with ID and/or ASD. Further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of identified interventions on teaching more complex science skills and with students with severe disabilities. Some limitations related to the search strategy are highlighted.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)847-880
    JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
    Volume56
    Issue number7
    Early online date29 Jan 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching science skills and knowledge to students with developmental disabilities: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this