@article{b0a2d33cdffb4014ad8537623b403a48,
title = "The Freedom of Archaeological Research: Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond)",
abstract = "Archaeologists like to think that heritage protection laws serve the purpose of protecting all archaeology from damage. Thus, provisions like that of §11 (1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz or Art. 3 i-ii of the Valletta Convention are interpreted as a blanket ban on archaeological fieldwork {\textquoteleft}unauthorized{\textquoteright} by national heritage agencies, and a general prohibition against archaeological field research by non-professionals. The Austrian National Heritage Agency, the Bundesdenkmalamt, interprets the Austrian law in this way. Using the Austrian example as a case study, this paper demonstrates that this interpretation must be wrong, since, if it were true, it would revoke a fundamental civil right enshrined both in the Austrian constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: the unconditional freedom of research, which applies to archaeological field research as to any other kind of academic research, and extends equally to every citizen.",
keywords = "ARCHAEOLOGY, LAW, Civil rights, Austria, Europe",
author = "Raimund Karl",
note = "Published online 02/05/2017",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/14655187.2016.1266228",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "23--39",
journal = "Public Archaeology",
issn = "1465-5187",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",
}