The impact of changing provider remuneration on clinical activity and quality of care: evaluation of a pilot NHS contract in Northern Ireland

  • Harry Hill
  • , Elizabeth Howarth
  • , Tanya Walsh
  • , Martin Tickle
  • , Stephen Birch
  • , Paul Brocklehurst

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    137 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Objectives
    A pilot NHS dental contract was introduced in Northern Ireland between 2015 and 2016, which involved changing the method for paying general dental practitioners working in the NHS from fee‐for‐service (FFS) to capitation‐based payments, providing an opportunity for a robust evaluation. We investigated the impact of a change in payment methods on clinical activity and the quality of care provided.

    Design
    A difference‐in‐difference (DiD) evaluation was applied to clinical activity data from pilot NHS dental practices in Northern Ireland compared to matched control NHS practices and applied to a questionnaire survey of patient‐rated outcomes of health outcomes and care quality. We estimated the impact on access to care, treatment activity levels, practice finances and patient‐rated outcomes of care of a change from FFS to a capitation‐based system for 1 year, as well as the impact of a reversion back to FFS at the end of the pilot period.

    Results
    The monthly number of registered patients in the pilot practices increased more than the control practices during the capitation period, by 1.5 registrations per 1000 registered patients. The monthly reductions in the volumes of all treatments in the pilot practices during the capitation period were much larger than the control practices, with 175 fewer treatment items. All measures rapidly returned to baseline levels following reversion from capitation back to FFS. NHS income per month increased in pilot practices, by £5920 per month (calculated on FFS item cost basis) more than controls in the capitation period. The analysis of patient questionnaires suggest found that patients notice differences only in waiting times, skill‐mix and number of radiographs, but not on other measures of healthcare process and quality.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)395-401
    Number of pages7
    JournalCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
    Volume48
    Issue number5
    Early online date14 Jun 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

    Keywords

    • access
    • economics
    • Program evaluation
    • quality of care
    • workforce

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of changing provider remuneration on clinical activity and quality of care: evaluation of a pilot NHS contract in Northern Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this