Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of securitization on credit rationing: Empirical evidence

  • S. Carbo-Valverde
  • , H. Degryse
  • , F. Rodriguez-Fernandez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We study whether banks’ involvement into different types of securitization activity – asset backed securities (ABS) and covered bonds – in Spain influences credit supply before and during the financial crisis. While both ABS and covered bonds were hit by the crisis, the former were hit more severely. Employing a disequilibrium model to identify credit rationing, we find that firms with banks that were more involved in securitization see their credit constraints more relaxed in normal periods. In contrast, only greater covered bonds issuance reduces credit rationing during crisis periods whereas ABS aggravates these firms’ credit rationing in crisis periods. Our results are in line with the theoretical predictions that a securitization instrument that retains risk (covered bond) may induce a more prudent risk behavior of banks than an instrument that provides risk transferring (ABS).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-50
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of securitization on credit rationing: Empirical evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this