The impact of stigma on the management of type 1 diabetes: A systematic review

  • Ronda Embick
  • , Mike Jackson
  • , Rose Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo systematically review the literature investigating the links between stigma and the management of type 1 diabetes.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Both quantitative and qualitative data were considered. Included papers were subject to quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and a narrative synthesis of results was reported.ResultsNineteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Amongst these, one study used mixed methods, nine were qualitative, and nine were quantitative. All studies found a negative relationship between stigma and type 1 diabetes management. Qualitative studies provided a further understanding of the effects observed in the quantitative studies and found that stigma can affect self‐care activities, disclosure of diabetes, and the uptake of diabetes technology. Systemic causes of stigma and intersectional stigma were also observed.ConclusionsThis review highlights that people with type 1 diabetes are negatively affected by stigma, irrespective of their age, gender, culture, or use of diabetes technology. Quantitative studies were limited, in that all studies were cross‐sectional, and there was a lack of standardisation across outcome measures. There is a need for interventions to target stigma on both an individual and a systemic level, particularly where people experience multiple intersecting stigmas.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere15299
JournalDiabetic Medicine
Volume41
Issue number4
Early online date15 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of stigma on the management of type 1 diabetes: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this