The language of architectural diagrams

Thora Tenbrink, Ruth Conroy Dalton, Anwen Jago Williams

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    325 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Complex buildings frequently present a challenge to users’ understanding, which may affect wayfinding as well as appreciation of the building’s structure. In this paper we focus on the building’s diagram, a representation by the building’s architect that captures its main ‘idea’. Motivated by the intuition that a building may be easier to understand if its conceptual diagram can be clearly and easily described, we explored perceivers’ descriptions of such diagrams' features. We asked students of Language and students of Architecture to write about the buildings represented in a variety of diagrams, and then repeated the task for photographs of the actual buildings. Using Cognitive Discourse Analysis, we aimed to create a first qualitative exploration of the linguistic and conceptual patterns that are associated with the perception of diagrams and images of complex buildings. Among other factors, results show how perception of the diagram's meaning is fundamentally affected by subject expertise. Linguistic patterns demonstrate the ways in which written descriptions reflect observers’ understanding and concepts of building representations, providing a starting point for future studies which may address the possible relationship between verbalisability of a diagram and the legibility of a building.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCOSIT 2019
    Subtitle of host publication14th Conference on Spatial Information Theory
    EditorsSabine Timpf, Christoph Schlieder, Markus Kattenbeck, Bernd Ludwig, Kathleen Stewart
    PublisherDagstuhl Publishing
    Chapter23
    Pages17:1-17:14
    ISBN (Print)9783959771153
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The language of architectural diagrams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this