The neuroscience of people watching: how the human brain makes sense of other people's encounters

Susanne Quadflieg, Kami Koldewyn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    719 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Neuroscientific investigations interested in questions of person perception and impression formation have traditionally asked their participants to observe and evaluate isolated individuals. In recent years, however, there has been a surge of studies presenting third-party encounters between two (or more) individuals as stimuli. Owing to this subtle methodological change, the brain's capacity to understand other people's interactions and relationships from limited visual information--also known as people watching--has become a distinct topic of inquiry. Though initial evidence indicates that this capacity relies on several well-known networks of the social brain (including the person-perception network, the action-observation network, and the mentalizing network), a comprehensive framework of people watching must overcome three major challenges. First, it must develop a taxonomy of judgments that people habitually make when witnessing the encounters of others. Second, it must clarify which visual cues give rise to these encounter-based judgments. Third, it must elucidate how and why several brain networks work together to accomplish these judgments. To advance all three lines of research, we summarize what is currently known as well as what remains to be studied about the neuroscience of people watching.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)166-182
    Number of pages17
    JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
    Volume1396
    Issue number1
    Early online date12 Apr 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2017

    Keywords

    • Journal Article
    • Review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The neuroscience of people watching: how the human brain makes sense of other people's encounters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this