Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Problem Management Plus psychosocial intervention for distressed and functionally impaired asylum seekers and refugees: the PROSPER feasibility RCT

  • Christopher Dowrick
  • , Anna Rosala-Hallas
  • , Rebecca Rawlinson
  • , Nalia Khan
  • , Eira Winrow
  • , Anna Chiumento
  • , Girvan Burnside
  • , Rabeea'h Aslam
  • , Leah Billows
  • , Malena Eriksson-Lee
  • , Daniel Lawrence
  • , Rachel McCluskey
  • , Annette Mackinnon
  • , Tracy Moitt
  • , Lois Orton
  • , Ewan Roberts
  • , Atif Rahman
  • , Grahame Smith
  • , Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
  • , Philomene Uwamaliya
  • Ross White
  • University of Liverpool
  • Swansea University
  • Sheffield University
  • Liverpool John Moores University
  • Asylum Link Merseyside, Liverpool
  • Person Shaped Support, Liverpool
  • British Red Cross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

239 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Asylum seekers and refugees often experience emotional distress, but they may find it hard to get the health and social care they need. Problem Management Plus (PM+) is an intervention designed to help people that is delivered by others (known as lay therapists) in similar situations, and it has been shown to help distressed people living in difficult circumstances. The aim of the PROSPER study was to find out if it is possible to conduct a trial of PM+ for distressed asylum seekers and refugees in the UK.
Using evidence from published research and from conversations with local experts, we aimed to modify PM+ to meet the needs of distressed asylum seekers and refugees living in Merseyside. We also aimed to train people with experience of the asylum process to deliver PM+. We designed a small-scale preliminary trial (a pilot trial) of five 90-minute sessions of PM+, comparing individual and group
sessions with usual treatment. We set out to recruit 105 people to take part in this pilot trial. The main outcomes were symptoms of anxiety and depression, which were to be measured at 3 and 6 months after recruitment into the trial.
We found that PM+ could be modified to meet the needs of asylum seekers and refugees living in Merseyside. We successfully trained 12 people with lived experience of the asylum process as lay therapists to deliver PM+. However, the pilot trial was cut short by the COVID-19 pandemic and we were able to involve only 11 people in it. We gathered information on how to involve people in the
trial, on how PM+ was delivered, and on how acceptable the study measures were.
Although we were unable to complete the pilot trial as planned, our findings offer guidance for future studies into mental health care provided by lay therapists for distressed asylum seekers and refugees.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages104
JournalPublic Health Research
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Problem Management Plus psychosocial intervention for distressed and functionally impaired asylum seekers and refugees: the PROSPER feasibility RCT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this