Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Universals and specifics of reading development in European languages. Cross Cultural Perspectives on Reading Disabilities

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Many European languages use alphabetic orthographies, and these can vary extensively in their transparency, or letter-sound consistency. An important question in cross-linguistic research on literacy development concerns the impact that orthographic consistency may have on the neuropsychological predictors as well as on the patterns of alphabetic reading development. In this presentation, I report on a series of studies that directly compared reading development in English, with its inconsistent orthography, and Spanish, Czech and Slovak, all with relatively consistent orthographies. The studies tracked children’s reading development from kindergarten to the end of grade 2, and focused on the cognitive precursors and correlates of early word reading skills, on the growth patterns of silent and aloud reading skills, and on the pathways to reading comprehension. These studies demonstrate that while orthographic consistency affects the rate of alphabetic reading and spelling acquisition, these skills are underpinned by a language-general set of cognitive skills. The implications of these findings for the identification of children at risk of literacy difficulties, as well as for their remediation will be discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)231
    Number of pages1
    JournalJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society
    Volume25
    Issue numberS1
    Early online dateFeb 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019
    EventForty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society - New York, United States
    Duration: 20 Feb 201923 Feb 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Universals and specifics of reading development in European languages. Cross Cultural Perspectives on Reading Disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this