Abstract
In this set of two experiments we tried to study how two different systems, a rhythmic and a memory-based one, can work together to generate explicit time perceptions. Using a time estimation task, participants were asked to report the duration of a visual stimulus appearing for a random interval ranging from 1 to 8 seconds. In one condition participants had to count the seconds before responding. In a different block participants were told not to count and simply
guess the time. Both strategies produced greatly different performance functions: 1) the counting strategy presented similarly fast reaction times as a function of interval and better discrimination in general; 2) the non-counting condition produced an inverted U-shape distribution in which extremes were responded to faster than intermediate values. This function was also linked to a
pattern of poor discrimination in the extreme intervals, with clear overshooting in the shorter and undershooting in the longer ones. More importantly, manipulation of verbal distraction and alterations to a rhythm produced an impact in the counting condition only, but not in the noncounting one. The results are interpreted under a combination of clock-based and memory-based
systems that coexist to produce explicit time estimations.
guess the time. Both strategies produced greatly different performance functions: 1) the counting strategy presented similarly fast reaction times as a function of interval and better discrimination in general; 2) the non-counting condition produced an inverted U-shape distribution in which extremes were responded to faster than intermediate values. This function was also linked to a
pattern of poor discrimination in the extreme intervals, with clear overshooting in the shorter and undershooting in the longer ones. More importantly, manipulation of verbal distraction and alterations to a rhythm produced an impact in the counting condition only, but not in the noncounting one. The results are interpreted under a combination of clock-based and memory-based
systems that coexist to produce explicit time estimations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 230-230 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Perception |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Verbal working memory influences time perception in explicit time estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
The role of verbalisations and anxiety in task switching
Baxendale, A. & Mari-Beffa, P., Mar 2022.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
-
¿Hablar con uno mismo es síntoma de trastorno mental? Más bien al contrario
Mari-Beffa, P., 25 Dec 2018, The Conversation.Translated title of the contribution :Is talking to yourself a sign of mental illness? More the contrary Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article
Open Access
Press/Media
-
Talking to yourself: a good antidote to loneliness – or the sign of a real problem?
25/04/21
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media: Expert Comment
Impacts
-
The impact of verbal commands on executive functions
Mari-Beffa, P. (Participant), Baxendale, A. (Participant) & Kirkham, A. (Participant)
Impact: Health/Quality of life
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver