Abstract
This article briefly surveys the interdisciplinary field of neuroscience and psychoanalysis (“neuropsychoanalysis”) and also addresses some of the criticisms that the field has encountered. First, the article reviews the historical foundations of neuropsychoanalysis, including both theoretical and technical questions of whether an interdiscipline is appropriate. Second, it discusses the philosophical foundations of the field, including the position of dual-aspect monism. Third, the article examines the scientific foundations, with a discussion of whether analytic work with neurological patients represents an optimal point of contact between the disciplines. Finally, the article engages with the issue of what neuropsychoanalysis is not, covering issues such as “speculation versus empirical research,” and the question of whether neuropsychoanalysis represents a new “school” of psychoanalysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Neuropsychoanalysis |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2011 |
Keywords
- neuropsychoanalysis
- history of science
- Freud
- mind-body problem
- dual-aspect monism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What is neuropsychoanalysis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Noropsikanaliz Nedir?
Solms, M., Turnbull, O. H. & Oezel, E. H. (Translator), Nov 2021, In: Psychotherapy Review. 2, 2Translated title of the contribution :What is neuropsychoanalysis? Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver