Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Innovative practice and occupational stress in care managment

  • Beth Parry-Jones

    Student thesis: Doctor of Philosophy

    Abstract

    Alongside the implementation of the NHS and Community Care Act 1990 came
    the wide-scale introduction of a new style of case management. Care
    management was to involve the design, monitoring and review of care packages
    based on a thorough assessment of service user need. Official documentation
    urged practitioners to "give full rein to their creativity in devising new ways of
    meeting needs". However, it was unclear how it could be achieved, why it might
    be beneficial and what factors might hinder or facilitate such practice. Two
    studies were conducted to investigate how innovative care management
    practice is characterised and undertaken by practitioners and what barriers and
    supports to such practice exist. The first study used case study methodology to
    examine in depth the innovative and non-innovative care management practice
    of five social work care managers. A model of the innovative care management
    process emerged along with provisional indicators of the factors influencing
    innovative (and non-innovative) care management practice.
    The second study involved a survey of care management practitioners in Wales
    (N = 181 ). Since stress in the workplace is both deleterious, apparently on the
    increase in community care practitioners and potentially has an adverse impact
    on individual innovation, stress level change indicators were examined
    alongside self-reports of innovative practice. Both quantitative and qualitative
    findings from the survey provide insight into frequency, type and influencing
    factors of innovative practice; levels of stress and job satisfaction; the demands
    on and levels of discretion of care management practitioners; and the interrelationships between innovation frequency, stress level change, job demands, job discretion and other relevant variables. Methodological issues are
    addressed and policy and practice implications outlined.
    Date of Award2003
    Original languageEnglish
    Awarding Institution
    • University of Wales, Bangor
    SponsorsWelsh Office for Research and Development in Health and Social Care
    SupervisorGordon Grant (Supervisor) & Bob Woods (Supervisor)

    Cite this

    '