Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Stimulus equivalence and exposure learning: a cross-disciplinary study of rapid vocabulary acquisition

    Student thesis: Doctor of Philosophy

    Abstract

    Cognitive/developmentalists and behaviour analysts have developed parallel
    paradigms of relevance to the investigation of the exposure learning of vocabulary in three contexts: non-ostensive, ostensive, and fast mapping/exclusion. Researchers have claimed that young children are able to comprehend new words following a limited number of unreinforced exposures. However, methodological limitations of such studies render the researchers' conclusions equivocal: participants' accurate responses on comprehension tests may reflect false positive responses, and cognitive/developmental researchers have failed to demonstrate that word-referent relations acquired are symbolic, and thus linguistic. The behaviour analytic stimulus equivalence paradigm provides a methodology for assessing the symbolic properties of such relational responding. The present se1ies of studies thus investigates young children's
    exposure learning of equivalence relations in rigorously controlled conditions.
    Study 1 investigated the exposure learning of a single new word-object relation;
    results highlighted the existence of false positive responding in such studies, and the necessity of exposing multiple relations. Studies 2 to 5 thus examined the exposure learning of two novel relations. Five children, aged 25 to 32 months, demonstrated the acquisition of word-referent relations following unreinforced non-ostensive, ostensive, or fast mapping/exclusion exposures; where tested, these children also demonstrated the derivation of symbolic -- equivalence -- relations. A history of conditional responding also facilitated some children's performances on subsequent test trials.
    However, the majority of participants (17/22) failed comprehension and naming
    tests. Given the paucity of methodological control implemented by cognitive/
    developmentalists these results were not unexpected and question claims made by such researchers regarding the efficiency of exposure learning.
    Date of Award2001
    Original languageEnglish
    Awarding Institution
    • University of Wales, Bangor
    SupervisorNeil Dugdale (Supervisor)

    Cite this

    '