Rewilding Forestry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Rewilding Forestry. / Dandy, Norman; Wynne-Jones, Sophie.
In: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 109, 101996, 12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Dandy, N & Wynne-Jones, S 2019, 'Rewilding Forestry', Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 109, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996

APA

Dandy, N., & Wynne-Jones, S. (2019). Rewilding Forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, Article 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996

CBE

Dandy N, Wynne-Jones S. 2019. Rewilding Forestry. Forest Policy and Economics. 109:Article 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Dandy N, Wynne-Jones S. Rewilding Forestry. Forest Policy and Economics. 2019 Dec;109:101996. Epub 2019 Aug 23. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996

Author

Dandy, Norman ; Wynne-Jones, Sophie. / Rewilding Forestry. In: Forest Policy and Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 109.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rewilding Forestry

AU - Dandy, Norman

AU - Wynne-Jones, Sophie

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Rewilding has become highly popular amongst conservationists, ecologists, geographers and others, but interest is considerably less obvious amongst foresters. Whilst overall the amount of research focused on rewilding continues to grow rapidly, very few papers published within core forestry journals engage with the concept. In this commentary, we offer some potential explanations for this lack of engagement which include rewilding’s early focus on animals (especially carnivores), its conceptual overlap with restoration, and the potentially profound implications for forestry practice and policy consequent to embracing the approach. Despite these issues and barriers, we argue for greater research attention to be given to rewilding by forest scientists. Increased interaction has the potential for significant mutual benefits. Foresters can bring a range of established insights to the debate that would inform key aspects of contemporary rewilding policy and practice, such as ecological succession dynamics and silvicultural approaches to transition. In response, rewilding has considerable potential for refreshing and reframing aspects of forestry policy and practice, including approaches to resilience.

AB - Rewilding has become highly popular amongst conservationists, ecologists, geographers and others, but interest is considerably less obvious amongst foresters. Whilst overall the amount of research focused on rewilding continues to grow rapidly, very few papers published within core forestry journals engage with the concept. In this commentary, we offer some potential explanations for this lack of engagement which include rewilding’s early focus on animals (especially carnivores), its conceptual overlap with restoration, and the potentially profound implications for forestry practice and policy consequent to embracing the approach. Despite these issues and barriers, we argue for greater research attention to be given to rewilding by forest scientists. Increased interaction has the potential for significant mutual benefits. Foresters can bring a range of established insights to the debate that would inform key aspects of contemporary rewilding policy and practice, such as ecological succession dynamics and silvicultural approaches to transition. In response, rewilding has considerable potential for refreshing and reframing aspects of forestry policy and practice, including approaches to resilience.

KW - Forest restoration

KW - Forest science

KW - Forestry journals

KW - Rewilding

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996

M3 - Article

VL - 109

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

M1 - 101996

ER -