Goal-orientations, intrinsic motivation & adherence to regular physical activity
Electronic versions
Documents
11.5 MB, PDF document
Abstract
This research has investigated exercise adherence from the perspective of Cognitive
Evaluation Theory (CET: Deci & Ryan, 1985a). In particular, the motivational
consequences of internally controlling and internally informational modes of behavioural
regulation was explored with respect to the kinds of exercise goals that individuals adopt. It
was proposed that goals will influence intrinsic motivation for exercise to the extent that
they are controlling or informational in nature. The first part of the thesis describes
conceptual and operational issues and the development and validation of measures of
perceived locus of causality (the Locus of Causality for Exercise Scale: LCE) and
participation motives (the Exercise Motivations Inventory: EMI). In addition, the
psychometric -integrity of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI: McAuley et al., 1989,
1991) was examined. Results suggested that the LCE and the EMI possessed reasonably
good factorial and construct validity. However, questions were raised about the theoretical
underpinnings and item content of the IMI. The second part of the research involved an
intervention in which subjects were trained to set effective, personally-controllable goals for exercise. Results showed that goal-setting training was not superior to an attentioncontrol
procedure, with both treatments leading to a significant increase in exercise levels.
However, large individual differences were noted in the effects of both treatments. These
were explained in terms of Causality Orientations Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985a), which
proposes that people differ in the extent to which they seek to be autonomous or controlled
in the regulation of their behaviour. Follow-up analyses supported this interpretation. The
results of the research programme suggest that the internally controlling/internally informational distinction is important in the exercise context, but that CET, and the more
wide-ranging Self-Determination Theory of which it is a part, suffer from a degree of
conceptual confusion and operational difficulties which need to be addressed if progress is
to be made in understanding and explaining exercise behaviour.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Awarding Institution | |
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 1993 |