The relation between crawling and allocentric spatial coding in infants
Electronic versions
Documents
32.9 MB, PDF document
Abstract
Allocentric coding is a spatial orientation strategy whereby the location of a hidden goal is coded in relation to landmarks. Research showing that the ability to use this coding strategy emerges at around 9 months has led to the proposal that its development is linked to the onset of crawling; this proposal is referred to as the crawling hypothesis.
Spatial orientation abilities were measured by task performance in a circular enclosure whereby, during training trials, infants were presented with an event (the appearance of an adult playing "peek-a-boo") from various viewing positions. During subsequent test trials from a new viewing position, no event was presented, and infants' looking responses were recorded. The experimental condition environment contained visual features landmarking the event's location; the control condition, by contrast, contained no visual features.
A series of cross-sectional studies examined whether infants younger than 9 months were able to use allocentric coding after a simpler reorientation (Study 1) and with a facilitating training regime and more salient landmarking (Study 2). A further study (Study 3) replicated the methodology used by Tyler and McKenzie (1990), who reported high levels of performance in 6- and 8-month-olds. Overall the findings from these studies left open the possibility of the crawling hypothesis as a viable proposal.
A longitudinal study (Study 4) examined the link between the onset of crawling and allocentric coding-by monitoring the development of spatial and motor abilities from 5 to 11 months-and provided little evidence to support the crawling hypothesis.
Consequently, alternatives to the crawling hypothesis are considered (such as visual attention and exploration linked to brain maturation).
Spatial orientation abilities were measured by task performance in a circular enclosure whereby, during training trials, infants were presented with an event (the appearance of an adult playing "peek-a-boo") from various viewing positions. During subsequent test trials from a new viewing position, no event was presented, and infants' looking responses were recorded. The experimental condition environment contained visual features landmarking the event's location; the control condition, by contrast, contained no visual features.
A series of cross-sectional studies examined whether infants younger than 9 months were able to use allocentric coding after a simpler reorientation (Study 1) and with a facilitating training regime and more salient landmarking (Study 2). A further study (Study 3) replicated the methodology used by Tyler and McKenzie (1990), who reported high levels of performance in 6- and 8-month-olds. Overall the findings from these studies left open the possibility of the crawling hypothesis as a viable proposal.
A longitudinal study (Study 4) examined the link between the onset of crawling and allocentric coding-by monitoring the development of spatial and motor abilities from 5 to 11 months-and provided little evidence to support the crawling hypothesis.
Consequently, alternatives to the crawling hypothesis are considered (such as visual attention and exploration linked to brain maturation).
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors | |
Thesis sponsors |
|
Award date | Jan 2002 |