Fersiynau electronig


Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)

  • Francesco Sartor
    Personal Health Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Matteo Bonato
    Universita di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • Gabriele Papini
    Personal Health Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Andrea Bosio
    Mapei Sport, Varese, Italy
  • Rahil A. Mohammed
    University of Sulaimani
  • Alberto G. Bonomi
    Personal Health Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Jonathan Moore
  • Giampiero Merati
    Universita di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • Antonio La Torre
    Universita di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • Hans-Peter Kubis
Cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) is a widespread essential indicator in Sports Science as well as in Sports Medicine. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for CRF based on a 45 second self-test, which can be conducted anywhere. Criterion validity, test re-test study was set up to accomplish our objectives. Data from 81 healthy volunteers (age: 29 ± 8 years, BMI: 24.0 ± 2.9), 18 of whom females, were used to validate this test against gold standard. Nineteen volunteers repeated this test twice in order to evaluate its repeatability. CRF estimation models were developed using heart rate (HR) features extracted from the resting, exercise, and the recovery phase. The most predictive HR feature was the intercept of the linear equation fitting the HR values during the recovery phase normalized for the height2 (r2 = 0.30). The Ruffier-Dickson Index (RDI), which was originally developed for this squat test, showed a negative significant correlation with CRF (r = -0.40), but explained only 15% of the variability in CRF. A multivariate model based on RDI and sex, age and height increased the explained variability up to 53% with a cross validation (CV) error of 0.532 L ∙ min-1 and substantial repeatability (ICC = 0.91). The best predictive multivariate model made use of the linear intercept of HR at the beginning of the recovery normalized for height2 and age2; this had an adjusted r2 = 0. 59, a CV error of 0.495 L·min-1 and substantial repeatability (ICC = 0.93). It also had a higher agreement in classifying CRF levels (κ = 0.42) than RDI-based model (κ = 0.29). In conclusion, this simple 45 s self-test can be used to estimate and classify CRF in healthy individuals with moderate accuracy and large repeatability when HR recovery features are included
Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Rhif yr erthygle0168154
CyfnodolynPLoS ONE
Rhif y cyfnodolyn12
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - 13 Rhag 2016

Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho

Nid oes data ar gael
Gweld graff cysylltiadau