StandardStandard

A Markov model assessing the impact on primary care practice revenues and patient's health when utilising mid-level providers, lesson learnt from the United Kingdom. / Hill, Harry; Macey, Richard; Brocklehurst, Paul.
Yn: Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Cyfrol 77, Rhif 4, 10.2017, t. 334-343.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Hill H, Macey R, Brocklehurst P. A Markov model assessing the impact on primary care practice revenues and patient's health when utilising mid-level providers, lesson learnt from the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2017 Hyd;77(4):334-343. Epub 2017 Maw 8. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12212

Author

Hill, Harry ; Macey, Richard ; Brocklehurst, Paul. / A Markov model assessing the impact on primary care practice revenues and patient's health when utilising mid-level providers, lesson learnt from the United Kingdom. Yn: Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2017 ; Cyfrol 77, Rhif 4. tt. 334-343.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Markov model assessing the impact on primary care practice revenues and patient's health when utilising mid-level providers, lesson learnt from the United Kingdom

AU - Hill, Harry

AU - Macey, Richard

AU - Brocklehurst, Paul

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using mid-level providers for dental “check-up” examinations and the treatment of caries in different NHS settings in the United Kingdom. Mid-level providers are a broad category that describes non-dentist members of dental teams. This study focused on the potential use of Dental Hygiene Therapists undertaking dental “check-up” examinations and simple restorative treatment, instead of dentists.MethodsA Markov model was used to construct the natural history of caries development in adults that visit a dental practice every six months over a five-year period. Three cost perspectives are taken: those borne to dental healthcare providers in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. These represent three separate forms of retrospective payment system that are currently in use in the United Kingdom. The cost outcome was the average amount of retained practice earnings required to provide healthcare per patient visit. The health outcome was the average length of time in a cavity-free state and the cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost for six months in a cavity-free state.ResultsNo statistical difference was found between dentists and mid-level providers in the length of time in a cavity-free state but the use of the latter saved money in all three NHS health system jurisdictions. This ranged from £7.85 (England and Wales) to £9.16 (Northern Ireland) per patient visit ($10.20 to $11.90, respectively) meaning the incremental cost for six month in a cavity-free state ranged from £261.67 ($339.93) in England and Wales to £305.33 ($369.68) in Northern Ireland. Further, changes in baseline assumptions and parameter values did not change mid-level providers being the dominant service intervention.ConclusionIn a time of limited funds for dental services, these results suggest that resources in public funded systems could be saved using mid-level providers in dental practices, without any health risk to patients or capital investment.

AB - ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using mid-level providers for dental “check-up” examinations and the treatment of caries in different NHS settings in the United Kingdom. Mid-level providers are a broad category that describes non-dentist members of dental teams. This study focused on the potential use of Dental Hygiene Therapists undertaking dental “check-up” examinations and simple restorative treatment, instead of dentists.MethodsA Markov model was used to construct the natural history of caries development in adults that visit a dental practice every six months over a five-year period. Three cost perspectives are taken: those borne to dental healthcare providers in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. These represent three separate forms of retrospective payment system that are currently in use in the United Kingdom. The cost outcome was the average amount of retained practice earnings required to provide healthcare per patient visit. The health outcome was the average length of time in a cavity-free state and the cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost for six months in a cavity-free state.ResultsNo statistical difference was found between dentists and mid-level providers in the length of time in a cavity-free state but the use of the latter saved money in all three NHS health system jurisdictions. This ranged from £7.85 (England and Wales) to £9.16 (Northern Ireland) per patient visit ($10.20 to $11.90, respectively) meaning the incremental cost for six month in a cavity-free state ranged from £261.67 ($339.93) in England and Wales to £305.33 ($369.68) in Northern Ireland. Further, changes in baseline assumptions and parameter values did not change mid-level providers being the dominant service intervention.ConclusionIn a time of limited funds for dental services, these results suggest that resources in public funded systems could be saved using mid-level providers in dental practices, without any health risk to patients or capital investment.

KW - Mid-level provider

KW - Drect access

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Screening

KW - Economic Evaluation

KW - Markov Model

U2 - 10.1111/jphd.12212

DO - 10.1111/jphd.12212

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 334

EP - 343

JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

SN - 0022-4006

IS - 4

ER -