Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Fersiynau electronig

Dogfennau

Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)

  • Christopher J Colvin
    University of Cape Town
  • Ruth Garside
    University of Exeter Medical School
  • Megan Wainwright
    University of Cape Town
  • Heather Munthe-Kaas
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. claire.glenton@fhi.no.
  • Claire Glenton
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Meghan A Bohren
    Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Benedicte Carlsen
    Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway.
  • Özge Tunçalp
    Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Jane Noyes
  • Andrew Booth
    University of Sheffield
  • Arash Rashidian
    Information, Evidence and Research Department, Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Signe Flottorp
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Simon Lewin
    Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. simon.lewin@fhi.no.

BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) relevance, (3) coherence and (4) adequacy of data. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual's coherence component.

METHODS: We developed the coherence component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual coherence component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application.

RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define coherence as how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesises that data. In this paper, we describe the coherence component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess coherence, the steps that need to be taken to assess coherence and examples of coherence assessments.

CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of coherence in the context of the CERQual approach. We suggest that threats to coherence may arise when the data supporting a review finding are contradictory, ambiguous or incomplete or where competing theories exist that could be used to synthesise the data. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.

Allweddeiriau

Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)13
CyfnodolynImplementation Science
Cyfrol13
Rhif y cyfnodolynSuppl 1
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - 25 Ion 2018

Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho

Nid oes data ar gael
Gweld graff cysylltiadau