Archaeological Responses to 5 Decades of Metal Detecting in Austria
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
Fersiynau electronig
Dogfennau
- [Open Archaeology] Archaeological Responses to 5 Decades%0Aof Metal Detecting in Austria
Fersiwn derfynol wedi’i chyhoeddi, 1.01 MB, dogfen-PDF
Trwydded: CC BY-NC-ND Dangos trwydded
Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)
Since metal detecting started in Austria in 1970, the National Heritage Agency (BDA) has focussed too much on prohibiting metal detecting. The strategy chosen, increasingly restrictive legislation, has turned out to be a failure. Rather than improving the protection of archaeological heritage from ‚unauthorised‘ metal detecting, the ‚hobby‘ has grown steadily. Yet, the changes to the law have made protecting archaeology more difficult and are restricting civil liberties, quite possibly making the law itself illegal. Five decades on, Austrian archaeology isn‘t better off, but considerably worse, and it is mainly our attempts to prevent metal detecting that are to blame.
Allweddeiriau
| Iaith wreiddiol | Saesneg |
|---|---|
| Tudalennau (o-i) | 278-289 |
| Nifer y tudalennau | 12 |
| Cyfnodolyn | Open Archaeology |
| Cyfrol | 2 |
| Rhif y cyfnodolyn | 1 |
| Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs) | |
| Statws | Cyhoeddwyd - 5 Rhag 2016 |
Cyhoeddiadau (6)
- Cyhoeddwyd
- Cyhoeddwyd
The ‚artefact erosion estimation‘-fallacy: Another response to papers by Samuel A. Hardy
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall
- Cyhoeddwyd
„Grabungsgenehmigung“? Braucht man nicht! Zwei maßgebliche Erkenntnisse österreichischer Gerichte aus dem Jahr 2017 zur archäologischen Denkmalpflege und ihre Konsequenzen
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall
Gweithgareddau a dyfarniadau proffesiynol (1)
Blunt instruments or intelligent solutions?
Gweithgaredd: Sgwrs neu gyflwyniad › Sgwrs wadd
Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho
Nid oes data ar gael