Aufklärung, Menschenrechte und Bürgerbeteiligung an der archäologischen Denkmalpflege
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
Fersiynau electronig
Dogfennau
- ArchInf-EV_Karl
Fersiwn derfynol wedi’i chyhoeddi, 382 KB, dogfen-PDF
Trwydded: CC BY-NC-SA Dangos trwydded
Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)
The Principles of the Enlightenment provide the foundation of modern science and the modern democratic state, including its public administrative functions in the field of archaeological heritage management. Indivisibly linked with the primary premise of the Enlightenment – the equality of all humans – is the concept of universal human rights: subjective, individual rights due to every human being
Among the participatory human rights, which the state has to provide for in the form of positive services, are the rights to freely participate in the cultural life of the community and the right to academic freedom. Modern science, in turn, is based on the idea of the general traceability of its results, which necessarily requires that every human must also be able to create his own scientific discoveries; that is, to be able and permitted to conduct scientific research himself as he sees fit without the guidance of others. Any attempt to prevent or unduly restrict self-determined public participation in archaeological heritage management thus not just violates already existing human rights. It also (especially, but not necessarily exclusively, in German-speaking Central Europe) constitutes an attack on modern science and our social and political order and thus on the foundations of modern archaeological heritage management itself.
Among the participatory human rights, which the state has to provide for in the form of positive services, are the rights to freely participate in the cultural life of the community and the right to academic freedom. Modern science, in turn, is based on the idea of the general traceability of its results, which necessarily requires that every human must also be able to create his own scientific discoveries; that is, to be able and permitted to conduct scientific research himself as he sees fit without the guidance of others. Any attempt to prevent or unduly restrict self-determined public participation in archaeological heritage management thus not just violates already existing human rights. It also (especially, but not necessarily exclusively, in German-speaking Central Europe) constitutes an attack on modern science and our social and political order and thus on the foundations of modern archaeological heritage management itself.
Allweddeiriau
Cyfieithiad o deitl y cyfraniad | The Enlightenment, Human Rights and Public Participation in Archaeological Heritage Management |
---|---|
Iaith wreiddiol | Almaeneg |
Tudalennau (o-i) | 25-35 |
Nifer y tudalennau | 11 |
Cyfnodolyn | Archäologische Informationen |
Cyfrol | 42 |
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar | 4 Maw 2019 |
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs) | |
Statws | Cyhoeddwyd - 13 Ion 2020 |
Cyhoeddiadau (10)
- Cyhoeddwyd
Der archäologische Grabungs-Kompetenz-Pass: Ein Mittel zur Dokumentation durch Praxis erworbener archäologischer Fertigkeiten
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
- Cyhoeddwyd
- Cyhoeddwyd
Archäologische Wissenschaft, Denkmalpflege oder G’schichtldruckerei? Reaktion auf ein Interview mit Harald Meller
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall
Gweithgareddau a dyfarniadau proffesiynol (8)
ArchaeoPublica (Cyhoeddwr)
Gweithgaredd: Cyhoeddiad adolygiad cymheiriaid a gwaith golygyddol › Gweithgarwch golygyddol
Wieviel Bürgerbeteiligung verträgt die Archäologie? Community Archaeology, Citizen Science und die archäologische Denkmalpflege
Gweithgaredd: Sgwrs neu gyflwyniad › Sgwrs wadd
Podiumsdiskussion: Kulturerbe als Menschenrecht?
Gweithgaredd: Sgwrs neu gyflwyniad › Sgwrs wadd
Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho
Nid oes data ar gael