Combining model-based clinical trial simulation, pharmacoeconomics and value of information to optimize trial design

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Combining model-based clinical trial simulation, pharmacoeconomics and value of information to optimize trial design. / Hill-McManus, Daniel; Hughes, Dyfrig.
Yn: CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology , Cyfrol 10, Rhif 1, 01.2021, t. 75-83.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Hill-McManus D, Hughes D. Combining model-based clinical trial simulation, pharmacoeconomics and value of information to optimize trial design. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology . 2021 Ion;10(1):75-83. Epub 2020 Rhag 12. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12579

Author

Hill-McManus, Daniel ; Hughes, Dyfrig. / Combining model-based clinical trial simulation, pharmacoeconomics and value of information to optimize trial design. Yn: CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology . 2021 ; Cyfrol 10, Rhif 1. tt. 75-83.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining model-based clinical trial simulation, pharmacoeconomics and value of information to optimize trial design

AU - Hill-McManus, Daniel

AU - Hughes, Dyfrig

N1 - no embargo upon publication

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - The Bayesian decision‐analytic approach to trial design uses prior distributions for treatment effects, updated with likelihoods for proposed trial data. Prior distributions for treatment effects based on previous trial results risks sample selection bias and difficulties when a proposed trial differs in terms of patient characteristics, medication adherence, or treatment doses and regimens. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of using pharmacometric‐based clinical trial simulation (CTS) to generate prior distributions for use in Bayesian decision‐theoretic trial design. The methods consisted of four principal stages: a CTS to predict the distribution of treatment response for a range of trial designs; Bayesian updating for a proposed sample size; a pharmacoeconomic model to represent the perspective of a reimbursement authority in which price is contingent on trial outcome; and a model of the pharmaceutical company return on investment linking drug prices to sales revenue. We used a case study of febuxostat versus allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. Trial design scenarios studied included alternative treatment doses, inclusion criteria, input uncertainty, and sample size. Optimal trial sample sizes varied depending on the uncertainty of model inputs, trial inclusion criteria, and treatment doses. This interdisciplinary framework for trial design and sample size calculation may have value in supporting decisions during later phases of drug development and in identifying costly sources of uncertainty, and thus inform future research and development strategies.

AB - The Bayesian decision‐analytic approach to trial design uses prior distributions for treatment effects, updated with likelihoods for proposed trial data. Prior distributions for treatment effects based on previous trial results risks sample selection bias and difficulties when a proposed trial differs in terms of patient characteristics, medication adherence, or treatment doses and regimens. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of using pharmacometric‐based clinical trial simulation (CTS) to generate prior distributions for use in Bayesian decision‐theoretic trial design. The methods consisted of four principal stages: a CTS to predict the distribution of treatment response for a range of trial designs; Bayesian updating for a proposed sample size; a pharmacoeconomic model to represent the perspective of a reimbursement authority in which price is contingent on trial outcome; and a model of the pharmaceutical company return on investment linking drug prices to sales revenue. We used a case study of febuxostat versus allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. Trial design scenarios studied included alternative treatment doses, inclusion criteria, input uncertainty, and sample size. Optimal trial sample sizes varied depending on the uncertainty of model inputs, trial inclusion criteria, and treatment doses. This interdisciplinary framework for trial design and sample size calculation may have value in supporting decisions during later phases of drug development and in identifying costly sources of uncertainty, and thus inform future research and development strategies.

U2 - 10.1002/psp4.12579

DO - 10.1002/psp4.12579

M3 - Article

C2 - 33314752

VL - 10

SP - 75

EP - 83

JO - CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

JF - CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

SN - 2163-8306

IS - 1

ER -