Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models. / Rulent, Julia; Calafat, Francisco; Banks, Christopher et al.
Yn: Frontiers in Marine Science, Cyfrol 7, 549467, 29.10.2020.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Rulent, J, Calafat, F, Banks, C, Bricheno, L, Gommenginger, C, Green, M, Haigh, ID, Lewis, H & Martin, ACH 2020, 'Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models', Frontiers in Marine Science, cyfrol. 7, 549467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.549467

APA

Rulent, J., Calafat, F., Banks, C., Bricheno, L., Gommenginger, C., Green, M., Haigh, I. D., Lewis, H., & Martin, A. C. H. (2020). Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, Erthygl 549467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.549467

CBE

Rulent J, Calafat F, Banks C, Bricheno L, Gommenginger C, Green M, Haigh ID, Lewis H, Martin ACH. 2020. Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models. Frontiers in Marine Science. 7:Article 549467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.549467

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Rulent J, Calafat F, Banks C, Bricheno L, Gommenginger C, Green M et al. Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2020 Hyd 29;7:549467. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.549467

Author

Rulent, Julia ; Calafat, Francisco ; Banks, Christopher et al. / Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models. Yn: Frontiers in Marine Science. 2020 ; Cyfrol 7.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Water Level Estimation in Coastal and Shelf Seas From Satellite Altimetry and Numerical Models

AU - Rulent, Julia

AU - Calafat, Francisco

AU - Banks, Christopher

AU - Bricheno, Lucy

AU - Gommenginger, Christine

AU - Green, Mattias

AU - Haigh, Ivan D.

AU - Lewis, Huw

AU - Martin, Adrien C. H.

PY - 2020/10/29

Y1 - 2020/10/29

N2 - Accurately resolving coastal Total Water Levels (TWL) is crucial for socio-economic and environmental reasons. Recent efforts in satellite altimetry and numerical modeling have improved accuracy over near-shore areas. In this study we used data from tide gauges (TGs), SAR-mode altimetry from two satellites [Sentinel-3A (S3) and CryoSat-2 (C2)], and a state-of-the-art high-resolution regional coupled environmental prediction model (Amm15) to undertake an inter-comparison between the observations and the model.The aim is to quantify our capability to measure TWL around the United Kingdom coast, and to quantify the capacity of the model to represent coastal TWL. Results show good agreement between the satellite and TG data [the mean correlation (R) over seventeen TGs between June 2016 and September 2017 is 0.85 for S3 and 0.80 for C2]. The satellite-model comparison shows that the variability is well captured (R = 0.98 for both satellite), however, there is an offset (−0.23 m for S3, −0.15 m for C2) between the satellite and model data, that is near-constant across the domain. This offset is partly attributed to the difference in the reference level used by the satellites and the model, and residual differences linked to the temporal resolution of the model. The best agreement between model and satellite is seen away from the coast, further than 3–4 km offshore. However, even within the coastal band, R remains high, ∼0.95 (S3) and∼0.96 (C2). In conclusion, models are still essential to represent TWL in coastal regions where there is no cover from in-situ observations, but satellite altimeters can now provide valuable observations that are reliable much closer to the coast than before.

AB - Accurately resolving coastal Total Water Levels (TWL) is crucial for socio-economic and environmental reasons. Recent efforts in satellite altimetry and numerical modeling have improved accuracy over near-shore areas. In this study we used data from tide gauges (TGs), SAR-mode altimetry from two satellites [Sentinel-3A (S3) and CryoSat-2 (C2)], and a state-of-the-art high-resolution regional coupled environmental prediction model (Amm15) to undertake an inter-comparison between the observations and the model.The aim is to quantify our capability to measure TWL around the United Kingdom coast, and to quantify the capacity of the model to represent coastal TWL. Results show good agreement between the satellite and TG data [the mean correlation (R) over seventeen TGs between June 2016 and September 2017 is 0.85 for S3 and 0.80 for C2]. The satellite-model comparison shows that the variability is well captured (R = 0.98 for both satellite), however, there is an offset (−0.23 m for S3, −0.15 m for C2) between the satellite and model data, that is near-constant across the domain. This offset is partly attributed to the difference in the reference level used by the satellites and the model, and residual differences linked to the temporal resolution of the model. The best agreement between model and satellite is seen away from the coast, further than 3–4 km offshore. However, even within the coastal band, R remains high, ∼0.95 (S3) and∼0.96 (C2). In conclusion, models are still essential to represent TWL in coastal regions where there is no cover from in-situ observations, but satellite altimeters can now provide valuable observations that are reliable much closer to the coast than before.

KW - altimetry

KW - comparison

KW - numerical model

KW - shelf sea

KW - water level

U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2020.549467

DO - 10.3389/fmars.2020.549467

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Marine Science

JF - Frontiers in Marine Science

SN - 2296-7745

M1 - 549467

ER -