Fersiynau electronig

Dogfennau

Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)

  • Holly Crudgington
    King's College London
  • Morwenna Rogers
    College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, 9 TR10 9EZ, UK.
  • Lucy Bray
    Edge Hill University, Lancashire, UK
  • Bernie Carter
    Edge Hill University, Lancashire, UK
  • Janet Currier
  • Frances Gibbon
    Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
  • Dyfrig Hughes
  • Samantha Lyle
    King's College London
  • Deborah Roberts
  • Catrin Tudur Smith
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool
  • Paul Gringras
    King's College London
  • Deb Pal
    King's College London
  • Christopher Morris
    College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, 9 TR10 9EZ, UK.

OBJECTIVE: Establishing a core set of outcomes to be evaluated and reported in intervention trials aims to improve the usefulness of health research. There is no established core outcome set (COS) for childhood epilepsies. The aim of this study was to select a COS to be used in evaluative research of interventions for children with rolandic epilepsy (RE).

METHODS: We followed guidance from the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative. First, we identified outcomes that had been measured in research through a systematic review. Second, young people with RE, parents, and professionals were invited to take part in a Delphi survey in which participants rated the importance of candidate outcomes. Last, a face-to-face meeting was convened to seek consensus on which outcomes were critical to include and to ratify the final COS.

RESULTS: From 37 eligible papers in the review, we identified and included 48 candidate outcomes in the survey. We sent invitations to 165 people registered to take part in the survey; of these, 102 (62%) completed Round 1, and 80 (78%) completed Round 2 (three young people, 16 parents, 61 professionals). In Round 2 we included four additional outcomes suggested by participants in Round 1. The consensus meeting included two young people, four parents, and nine professionals who were eligible to vote and ratified the COS as 39 outcomes across 10 domains.

SIGNIFICANCE: Our methodology was a proportionate and pragmatic approach toward producing a COS for evaluating research on interventions aiming to improve the health of children with RE.

Allweddeiriau

Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)857-871
CyfnodolynEpilepsia
Cyfrol60
Rhif y cyfnodolyn5
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar25 Ebr 2019
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - Mai 2019

Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho

Nid oes data ar gael
Gweld graff cysylltiadau