StandardStandard

Critical Essay: Organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: The curious case of the straw man murder: organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: The curious case of the straw man murder. / Butler, Michael J.R.; Lee, Nick; Senior, Carl.
Yn: Human Relations, Cyfrol 70, Rhif 10, 01.10.2017, t. 1171-1190.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Essay: Organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: The curious case of the straw man murder: organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: The curious case of the straw man murder

AU - Butler, Michael J.R.

AU - Lee, Nick

AU - Senior, Carl

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - In this critical essay, we respond to Lindebaum’s (2016) argument that neuroscientific methodologies and data have been accepted prematurely in proposing novel management theory. We acknowledge that building new management theories requires firm foundations. We also find his distinction between demand and supply side forces helpful as an analytical framework identifying the momentum for the contemporary production of management theory. Nevertheless, some of the arguments Lindebaum (2016) puts forward, on closer inspection, can be contested, especially those related to the supply side of organizational cognitive neuroscience (OCN) research: fMRI data, motherhood statements and ethical concerns. We put forward a more positive case for OCN methodologies and data, as well as clarifying exactly what OCN really means, and its consequences for the development of strong management theory.

AB - In this critical essay, we respond to Lindebaum’s (2016) argument that neuroscientific methodologies and data have been accepted prematurely in proposing novel management theory. We acknowledge that building new management theories requires firm foundations. We also find his distinction between demand and supply side forces helpful as an analytical framework identifying the momentum for the contemporary production of management theory. Nevertheless, some of the arguments Lindebaum (2016) puts forward, on closer inspection, can be contested, especially those related to the supply side of organizational cognitive neuroscience (OCN) research: fMRI data, motherhood statements and ethical concerns. We put forward a more positive case for OCN methodologies and data, as well as clarifying exactly what OCN really means, and its consequences for the development of strong management theory.

KW - management

KW - methodology

KW - organizational cognitive neuroscience

KW - practice

KW - theory

U2 - 10.1177/0018726716684381

DO - 10.1177/0018726716684381

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 1171

EP - 1190

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 10

ER -