Das Grab als Haus – das Haus als Grab
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft Wien, Cyfrol 145, 12.2015, t. 117-134.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Das Grab als Haus – das Haus als Grab
AU - Karl, Raimund
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - Iron Age burials frequently exceed the minimum that is required to bury someone in them, even if one wants to send the deceased off with grave goods. Particularly the well-known “princely” tombs of the Late Hallstatt period are reminiscent of a cosy living room; fancy furniture included. That graves are ‘houses of the dead’ is a widely used metaphor, which would not be particularly surprising in the Iron Age either. Yet, other regions of the European Iron Age, not least much of the British Isles, are characterised by a distinct absence of ‘regular’ burial in cemeteries. In those regions, one rather finds quite frequently human remains or burials in settlement contexts. To make a distinction between house (or settlement) and grave (or cemetery) is difficult in such areas: if the grave is in the house, the house is also a grave. Particularly in the west of the British Isles, it also increasingly seems as if houses themselves were ‘buried’ at the end of their lifecycle, or served as graves as the last function in their lifecycle. In this contribution, it will be discussed to what extent the inhabitants of late prehistoric central and western Europe considered graves as ‘houses of the dead’ and their own houses as their own (future) graves.
AB - Iron Age burials frequently exceed the minimum that is required to bury someone in them, even if one wants to send the deceased off with grave goods. Particularly the well-known “princely” tombs of the Late Hallstatt period are reminiscent of a cosy living room; fancy furniture included. That graves are ‘houses of the dead’ is a widely used metaphor, which would not be particularly surprising in the Iron Age either. Yet, other regions of the European Iron Age, not least much of the British Isles, are characterised by a distinct absence of ‘regular’ burial in cemeteries. In those regions, one rather finds quite frequently human remains or burials in settlement contexts. To make a distinction between house (or settlement) and grave (or cemetery) is difficult in such areas: if the grave is in the house, the house is also a grave. Particularly in the west of the British Isles, it also increasingly seems as if houses themselves were ‘buried’ at the end of their lifecycle, or served as graves as the last function in their lifecycle. In this contribution, it will be discussed to what extent the inhabitants of late prehistoric central and western Europe considered graves as ‘houses of the dead’ and their own houses as their own (future) graves.
KW - Iron Age
KW - burial practice
KW - belief
KW - religion
KW - Europe
KW - Ireland
M3 - Erthygl
VL - 145
SP - 117
EP - 134
JO - Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft Wien
JF - Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft Wien
SN - 0373-5656
ER -