Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study)

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study). / M.B., Gabbay; Ring, Adele; Byng, Richard et al.
Yn: Health Technology Assessment, Cyfrol 21, Rhif 3, 06.2017.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

M.B., G, Ring, A, Byng, R, Anderson, P, Taylor, RS, Matthews, C, Harris, T, Berry, V, Byrne, P, Carter, E, Clarke, P, Cocking, L, Edwards, S, Emsley, R, Fornasiero, M, Frith, L, Harris, S, Huxley, P, Jones, S, Kinderman, P, King, M, Kosnes, L, Marshall, D, Mercer, D, May, C, Nolan, D, Philips, C, Rawcliffe, T, Sardani, AV, Shaw, E, Thompson, S, Vickery, J, Wainman, B & Warner, M 2017, 'Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study)', Health Technology Assessment, cyfrol. 21, rhif 3. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21350

APA

M.B., G., Ring, A., Byng, R., Anderson, P., Taylor, R. S., Matthews, C., Harris, T., Berry, V., Byrne, P., Carter, E., Clarke, P., Cocking, L., Edwards, S., Emsley, R., Fornasiero, M., Frith, L., Harris, S., Huxley, P., Jones, S., ... Warner, M. (2017). Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study). Health Technology Assessment, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21350

CBE

M.B. G, Ring A, Byng R, Anderson P, Taylor RS, Matthews C, Harris T, Berry V, Byrne P, Carter E, et al. 2017. Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study). Health Technology Assessment. 21(3). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21350

MLA

VancouverVancouver

M.B. G, Ring A, Byng R, Anderson P, Taylor RS, Matthews C et al. Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study). Health Technology Assessment. 2017 Meh;21(3). doi: 10.3310/hta21350

Author

M.B., Gabbay ; Ring, Adele ; Byng, Richard et al. / Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care : an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study). Yn: Health Technology Assessment. 2017 ; Cyfrol 21, Rhif 3.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care

T2 - an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study)

AU - M.B., Gabbay

AU - Ring, Adele

AU - Byng, Richard

AU - Anderson, Pippa

AU - Taylor, Rod S.

AU - Matthews, Caryn

AU - Harris, Tirril

AU - Berry, Vashti

AU - Byrne, Paula

AU - Carter, Elliot

AU - Clarke, Pam

AU - Cocking, Laura

AU - Edwards, Suzanne

AU - Emsley, Richard

AU - Fornasiero, Mauro

AU - Frith, Lucy

AU - Harris, Shaun

AU - Huxley, Peter

AU - Jones, Siw

AU - Kinderman, Peter

AU - King, Michael

AU - Kosnes, Liv

AU - Marshall, Daniel

AU - Mercer, Dave

AU - May, Carl

AU - Nolan, Debbie

AU - Philips, Ceri

AU - Rawcliffe, Tim

AU - Sardani, Alexandra V.

AU - Shaw, Elizabeth

AU - Thompson, Sam

AU - Vickery, Jane

AU - Wainman, Brian

AU - Warner, Mark

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - BackgroundDepression and debt are common in the UK. Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer) aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the addition of a primary care debt counselling advice service to usual care for patients with depression and debt. However, the study was terminated early during the internal pilot trial phase because of recruitment delays. This report describes the rationale, methods and findings of the pilot study, and implications for future research.ObjectivesThe overarching aim of the internal pilot was to identify and resolve problems, thereby assessing the feasibility of the main trial. The specific objectives were to confirm methods for practice recruitment and the ability to recruit patients via the proposed approaches; to determine the acceptability of the study interventions and outcome measures; to assess contamination; to confirm the randomisation method for main trial and the level of participant attrition; and to check the robustness of data collection systems.DesignAn adaptive, parallel, two-group multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial with a nested mixed-methods process and economic evaluation. Both individual- and cluster (general practice)-level were was used in the pilot phase to assign participants to intervention or control groups.SettingGeneral practices in England and Wales.ParticipantsIndividuals were included who were aged ≥ 18 years, scored ≥ 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory II and self-identified as having debt worries. The main exclusion criteria were being actively suicidal or psychotic and/or severely depressed and unresponsive to treatment; having a severe addiction to alcohol/illicit drugs; being unable/unwilling to give written informed consent; currently participating in other research including follow-up phases; having received Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) debt advice in the past year; and not wanting debt advice via a general practice.InterventionsThe participants in the intervention group were given debt advice provided by the CAB and shared biopsychosocial assessment, in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) and two debt advice leaflets. The participants in the control group were given advice leaflets provided by the general practitioner and TAU only.Main outcome measures(1) Outcomes of the pilot trial – the proportion of eligible patients who consented, the number of participants recruited compared with target, assessment of contamination, and assessment of patient satisfaction with intervention and outcome measures. (2) Participant outcomes – primary – Beck Depression Inventory II; secondary – psychological well-being, health and social care utilisation, service satisfaction, substance misuse, record of priority/non-priority debts, life events and difficulties, and explanatory measures. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation) and at 4 months post randomisation. Other data sources – qualitative interviews were conducted with participants, clinicians and CAB advisors.ResultsOf the 238 expressions of interest screened, 61 participants (26%) were recruited and randomised (32 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group). All participants provided baseline outcomes and 52 provided the primary outcome at 4 months’ follow-up (14.7% dropout). Seventeen participants allocated to the intervention saw a CAB advisor. Descriptive statistics are reported for participants with complete outcomes at baseline and 4 months’ follow-up. Our qualitative findings suggest that the relationship between debt and depression is complex, and the impact of each on the other is compounded by other psychological, social and contextual influences.ConclusionsAs a result of low recruitment, this trial was terminated at the internal pilot phase and was too small for inferential statistical analysis. We recommend ways to reduce this risk when conducting complex trials among vulnerable populations recruited in community settings. These cover trial design, the design and delivery of interventions, recruitment strategies and support for sites.

AB - BackgroundDepression and debt are common in the UK. Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer) aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the addition of a primary care debt counselling advice service to usual care for patients with depression and debt. However, the study was terminated early during the internal pilot trial phase because of recruitment delays. This report describes the rationale, methods and findings of the pilot study, and implications for future research.ObjectivesThe overarching aim of the internal pilot was to identify and resolve problems, thereby assessing the feasibility of the main trial. The specific objectives were to confirm methods for practice recruitment and the ability to recruit patients via the proposed approaches; to determine the acceptability of the study interventions and outcome measures; to assess contamination; to confirm the randomisation method for main trial and the level of participant attrition; and to check the robustness of data collection systems.DesignAn adaptive, parallel, two-group multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial with a nested mixed-methods process and economic evaluation. Both individual- and cluster (general practice)-level were was used in the pilot phase to assign participants to intervention or control groups.SettingGeneral practices in England and Wales.ParticipantsIndividuals were included who were aged ≥ 18 years, scored ≥ 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory II and self-identified as having debt worries. The main exclusion criteria were being actively suicidal or psychotic and/or severely depressed and unresponsive to treatment; having a severe addiction to alcohol/illicit drugs; being unable/unwilling to give written informed consent; currently participating in other research including follow-up phases; having received Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) debt advice in the past year; and not wanting debt advice via a general practice.InterventionsThe participants in the intervention group were given debt advice provided by the CAB and shared biopsychosocial assessment, in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) and two debt advice leaflets. The participants in the control group were given advice leaflets provided by the general practitioner and TAU only.Main outcome measures(1) Outcomes of the pilot trial – the proportion of eligible patients who consented, the number of participants recruited compared with target, assessment of contamination, and assessment of patient satisfaction with intervention and outcome measures. (2) Participant outcomes – primary – Beck Depression Inventory II; secondary – psychological well-being, health and social care utilisation, service satisfaction, substance misuse, record of priority/non-priority debts, life events and difficulties, and explanatory measures. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation) and at 4 months post randomisation. Other data sources – qualitative interviews were conducted with participants, clinicians and CAB advisors.ResultsOf the 238 expressions of interest screened, 61 participants (26%) were recruited and randomised (32 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group). All participants provided baseline outcomes and 52 provided the primary outcome at 4 months’ follow-up (14.7% dropout). Seventeen participants allocated to the intervention saw a CAB advisor. Descriptive statistics are reported for participants with complete outcomes at baseline and 4 months’ follow-up. Our qualitative findings suggest that the relationship between debt and depression is complex, and the impact of each on the other is compounded by other psychological, social and contextual influences.ConclusionsAs a result of low recruitment, this trial was terminated at the internal pilot phase and was too small for inferential statistical analysis. We recommend ways to reduce this risk when conducting complex trials among vulnerable populations recruited in community settings. These cover trial design, the design and delivery of interventions, recruitment strategies and support for sites.

U2 - 10.3310/hta21350

DO - 10.3310/hta21350

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Health Technology Assessment

JF - Health Technology Assessment

SN - 1366-5278

IS - 3

ER -