Double standards in speakers’ minds? An evaluation of standard varieties in Luxembourg and Belgium
Allbwn ymchwil: Pennod mewn Llyfr/Adroddiad/Trafodion Cynhadledd › Pennod › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Double Standards. Peter Lang Publishing, 2025. (Historical Sociolinguistics).
Allbwn ymchwil: Pennod mewn Llyfr/Adroddiad/Trafodion Cynhadledd › Pennod › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Double standards in speakers’ minds? An evaluation of standard varieties in Luxembourg and Belgium
AU - Vari, Judit
AU - Tamburelli, Marco
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - We investigate how double standard norms manifest at individuals’ perceptual level. To do so, we study attitudes towards the (non-)standard varieties in two speech communities, i.e. the Belgische Eifel in Belgium and the Canton Clervaux in Luxembourg. In these communities, differences in codified norms emerge from differing standardisation processes: Standard Luxembourgish shows lower levels of codification and implementation, compared to the highly standardised Hochdeutsch present in Belgium. In contrast, norms of usage are more similar, since in both speech communities, individuals possess concepts of model speakers and model texts of their respective standards. In this paper, we hypothesise that differences in codified norms will manifest in the type of explicit attitudes that previous studies have found to require more cognitive effort. On the other hand, similarities in norms of usage will manifest in implicit attitudes requiring less cognitive effort. Implicit attitudes were tested with Implicit Association Tests, while explicit attitudes were measured with questionnaires.
AB - We investigate how double standard norms manifest at individuals’ perceptual level. To do so, we study attitudes towards the (non-)standard varieties in two speech communities, i.e. the Belgische Eifel in Belgium and the Canton Clervaux in Luxembourg. In these communities, differences in codified norms emerge from differing standardisation processes: Standard Luxembourgish shows lower levels of codification and implementation, compared to the highly standardised Hochdeutsch present in Belgium. In contrast, norms of usage are more similar, since in both speech communities, individuals possess concepts of model speakers and model texts of their respective standards. In this paper, we hypothesise that differences in codified norms will manifest in the type of explicit attitudes that previous studies have found to require more cognitive effort. On the other hand, similarities in norms of usage will manifest in implicit attitudes requiring less cognitive effort. Implicit attitudes were tested with Implicit Association Tests, while explicit attitudes were measured with questionnaires.
M3 - Chapter
T3 - Historical Sociolinguistics
BT - Double Standards
PB - Peter Lang Publishing
ER -