Effects of Neurofeedback Training on Frontal Midline Theta Power, Shooting Performance and Attentional Focus with Experienced Biathletes
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 09.05.2023.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Neurofeedback Training on Frontal Midline Theta Power, Shooting Performance and Attentional Focus with Experienced Biathletes
AU - Toolis, Thomas
AU - Cooke, Andrew
AU - Laaksonen, Marko
AU - McGawley, Kerry
N1 - no embargo upon publication
PY - 2023/5/9
Y1 - 2023/5/9
N2 - Frontal midline theta power (FMT) has been associated with superior rifle shooting performance. Our experiment examined whether electroencephalographic-based training could increase FMT, shooting performance and attentional focus in highly-trained/elite biathletes. Participants (n = 28; age, M = 21.7, SD = 2.3) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group (with 3 h of neurofeedback training). FMT increased from baseline during the neurofeedback training sessions (p ≤ 0.05). However, there were no group × pre-post training (test) interactions for FMT or shooting performance (p > 0.05). There was a small group × test effect for attentional focus (p = 0.07; ηp2 = 0.12), indicating a potential benefit of neurofeedback training. Superior shooters were more proficient at increasing FMT during neurofeedback training, but this did not translate to greater improvements in shooting performance. Our findings suggest that the effects of neurofeedback training are transient and do not necessarily benefit performance.
AB - Frontal midline theta power (FMT) has been associated with superior rifle shooting performance. Our experiment examined whether electroencephalographic-based training could increase FMT, shooting performance and attentional focus in highly-trained/elite biathletes. Participants (n = 28; age, M = 21.7, SD = 2.3) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group (with 3 h of neurofeedback training). FMT increased from baseline during the neurofeedback training sessions (p ≤ 0.05). However, there were no group × pre-post training (test) interactions for FMT or shooting performance (p > 0.05). There was a small group × test effect for attentional focus (p = 0.07; ηp2 = 0.12), indicating a potential benefit of neurofeedback training. Superior shooters were more proficient at increasing FMT during neurofeedback training, but this did not translate to greater improvements in shooting performance. Our findings suggest that the effects of neurofeedback training are transient and do not necessarily benefit performance.
U2 - 10.1123/jcsp.2022-0035
DO - 10.1123/jcsp.2022-0035
M3 - Article
JO - Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
JF - Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
SN - 1932-9261
ER -