Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil. / Betenson, Toby.
Yn: Religious Studies, Cyfrol 51, Rhif 3, 09.2015, t. 361-377.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Betenson, T 2015, 'Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil', Religious Studies, cyfrol. 51, rhif 3, tt. 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441251400050X

APA

Betenson, T. (2015). Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil. Religious Studies, 51(3), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441251400050X

CBE

MLA

Betenson, Toby. "Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil". Religious Studies. 2015, 51(3). 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441251400050X

VancouverVancouver

Betenson T. Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil. Religious Studies. 2015 Medi;51(3):361-377. Epub 2014 Rhag 9. doi: 10.1017/S003441251400050X

Author

Betenson, Toby. / Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil. Yn: Religious Studies. 2015 ; Cyfrol 51, Rhif 3. tt. 361-377.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluative Claims within the Problem of Evil

AU - Betenson, Toby

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - The problem of evil contains some evaluative claims. Recognizing the fundamental role of the evaluative claims within the problem of evil presents two significant problems for the argument from evil. First, in order for the argument from evil to be successful, the normative assumptions that underlie the evaluative claims within the problem of evil must be deployed consistently both within the problem and between those who are discussing the problem. This level of normative agreement is likely to be difficult to achieve. Second, the argument from evil moves from evaluative premises to a non-evaluative conclusion, and thus commits the same error that J. L. Mackie identifies the moral argument for the existence of God as committing: it gets the direction of supervenience between facts and values back-to-front. Mackie's criticisms of the moral argument for the existence of God ought to also apply to the moral argument against the existence of God. If my analysis is correct, and Mackie's point is valid, then the argument from evil will be left fatally undermined. The problem of evil cannot be used to argue for the conclusion that ‘God does not exist’.

AB - The problem of evil contains some evaluative claims. Recognizing the fundamental role of the evaluative claims within the problem of evil presents two significant problems for the argument from evil. First, in order for the argument from evil to be successful, the normative assumptions that underlie the evaluative claims within the problem of evil must be deployed consistently both within the problem and between those who are discussing the problem. This level of normative agreement is likely to be difficult to achieve. Second, the argument from evil moves from evaluative premises to a non-evaluative conclusion, and thus commits the same error that J. L. Mackie identifies the moral argument for the existence of God as committing: it gets the direction of supervenience between facts and values back-to-front. Mackie's criticisms of the moral argument for the existence of God ought to also apply to the moral argument against the existence of God. If my analysis is correct, and Mackie's point is valid, then the argument from evil will be left fatally undermined. The problem of evil cannot be used to argue for the conclusion that ‘God does not exist’.

U2 - 10.1017/S003441251400050X

DO - 10.1017/S003441251400050X

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 361

EP - 377

JO - Religious Studies

JF - Religious Studies

SN - 0034-4125

IS - 3

ER -