StandardStandard

Exploring the similarities and differences of variables collected by burn registers globally: protocol for a data dictionary review study. / Bebbington, Emily; Miles, Joanna; Peck, Michael et al.
Yn: BMJ Open, Cyfrol 13, Rhif 2, e066512, 28.02.2023.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Bebbington E, Miles J, Peck M, Singer Y, Dunn K, Young A. Exploring the similarities and differences of variables collected by burn registers globally: protocol for a data dictionary review study. BMJ Open. 2023 Chw 28;13(2):e066512. Epub 2023 Chw 28. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066512

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the similarities and differences of variables collected by burn registers globally: protocol for a data dictionary review study

AU - Bebbington, Emily

AU - Miles, Joanna

AU - Peck, Michael

AU - Singer, Yvonne

AU - Dunn, Ken

AU - Young, Amber

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2023/2/28

Y1 - 2023/2/28

N2 - Introduction Burn registers can provide high-quality clinical data that can be used for surveillance, research, planning service provision and clinical quality assessment. Many countrywide and intercountry burn registers now exist. The variables collected by burn registers are not standardised internationally. Few international burn register data comparisons are completed beyond basic morbidity and mortality statistics. Data comparisons across registers require analysis of homogenous variables. Little work has been done to understand whether burn registers have sufficiently similar variables to enable useful comparisons. The aim of this project is to compare the variables collected in countrywide and intercountry burn registers internationally to understand their similarities and differences.Methods and analysis Burn register custodians will be invited to participate in the study and to share their register data dictionaries. Study objectives are to compare patient inclusion and exclusion criteria of each participating burn register; determine which variables are collected by each register, and if variables are required or optional, identify common variable themes; and compare a sample of variables to understand how they are defined and measured. All variable names will be extracted from each register and common themes will be identified. Detailed information will be extracted for a sample of variables to give a deeper insight into similarities and differences between registers.Ethics and dissemination No patient data will be used in this project. Permission to use each register’s data dictionary will be sought from respective register custodians. Results will be presented at international meetings and published in open access journals. These results will be of interest to register custodians and researchers wishing to explore international data comparisons, and countries wishing to establish their own burn register.

AB - Introduction Burn registers can provide high-quality clinical data that can be used for surveillance, research, planning service provision and clinical quality assessment. Many countrywide and intercountry burn registers now exist. The variables collected by burn registers are not standardised internationally. Few international burn register data comparisons are completed beyond basic morbidity and mortality statistics. Data comparisons across registers require analysis of homogenous variables. Little work has been done to understand whether burn registers have sufficiently similar variables to enable useful comparisons. The aim of this project is to compare the variables collected in countrywide and intercountry burn registers internationally to understand their similarities and differences.Methods and analysis Burn register custodians will be invited to participate in the study and to share their register data dictionaries. Study objectives are to compare patient inclusion and exclusion criteria of each participating burn register; determine which variables are collected by each register, and if variables are required or optional, identify common variable themes; and compare a sample of variables to understand how they are defined and measured. All variable names will be extracted from each register and common themes will be identified. Detailed information will be extracted for a sample of variables to give a deeper insight into similarities and differences between registers.Ethics and dissemination No patient data will be used in this project. Permission to use each register’s data dictionary will be sought from respective register custodians. Results will be presented at international meetings and published in open access journals. These results will be of interest to register custodians and researchers wishing to explore international data comparisons, and countries wishing to establish their own burn register.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066512

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066512

M3 - Article

C2 - 36854585

VL - 13

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e066512

ER -