StandardStandard

Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care: A pilot study in South Yorkshire. / Brocklehurst, Paul R; Baker, Sarah R; Speight, Paul M.
Yn: Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Cyfrol 16, Rhif 1, 01.2009, t. 13-8.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Brocklehurst, PR, Baker, SR & Speight, PM 2009, 'Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care: A pilot study in South Yorkshire', Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England, cyfrol. 16, rhif 1, tt. 13-8. https://doi.org/10.1308/135576109786994631

APA

Brocklehurst, P. R., Baker, S. R., & Speight, P. M. (2009). Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care: A pilot study in South Yorkshire. Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 16(1), 13-8. https://doi.org/10.1308/135576109786994631

CBE

Brocklehurst PR, Baker SR, Speight PM. 2009. Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care: A pilot study in South Yorkshire. Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 16(1):13-8. https://doi.org/10.1308/135576109786994631

MLA

Brocklehurst, Paul R, Sarah R Baker a Paul M Speight. "Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care: A pilot study in South Yorkshire". Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2009, 16(1). 13-8. https://doi.org/10.1308/135576109786994631

VancouverVancouver

Brocklehurst PR, Baker SR, Speight PM. Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care: A pilot study in South Yorkshire. Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2009 Ion;16(1):13-8. doi: 10.1308/135576109786994631

Author

Brocklehurst, Paul R ; Baker, Sarah R ; Speight, Paul M. / Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care : A pilot study in South Yorkshire. Yn: Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2009 ; Cyfrol 16, Rhif 1. tt. 13-8.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting the referral of potentially malignant lesions from primary dental care

T2 - A pilot study in South Yorkshire

AU - Brocklehurst, Paul R

AU - Baker, Sarah R

AU - Speight, Paul M

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - AIMS: Early diagnosis of oral cancer is an essential element of prevention, yet many patients present late, suggesting that criteria used for referral miss the small or early-stage lesions. The aims of this study were to determine what cues are used by primary care dentists when making the decision to refer a suspicious lesion, and to investigate their recent referral behaviour.METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a postal questionnaire was undertaken in a major conurbation in South Yorkshire. The questionnaire was sent to all 95 practices in the area concerned. Primary care dentists were asked to score a range of cues on a five-point scale and list their top ten. Experience of referrals made in the last 12 months was also recorded.RESULTS: Forty-two questionnaires were returned (44.2%). The cues that primary care dentists 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' would initiate a referral were: 'fixed', 'smokes >20 cigarettes/day', 'indurated', 'ragged borders' and 'ulceration'. The most cited top-ten cues were 'ulcerated', 'fixed to underlying tissues', 'smoking' and 'indurated'. The median number of lesions referred was 0.77 per 1000 adult patients. Twenty-six dentists recorded their experience of 29 lesions. Of these, 17% had been found by the patient whereas 80% had been found at a routine dental examination. Seventy-nine per cent had been present for more than six weeks. Reasons for referral included atypical appearance (38%), ulceration (21%) and location (21%). Fifty-four per cent of primary care dentists described their relationship with secondary care as either 'good' or 'excellent'.CONCLUSIONS: The most cited cues related to established or advanced disease, not to 'red' and 'white' lesions, which the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend for early referral. Even allowing for the relatively poor response rate, this suggests that some small lesions of oral cancer are being missed.

AB - AIMS: Early diagnosis of oral cancer is an essential element of prevention, yet many patients present late, suggesting that criteria used for referral miss the small or early-stage lesions. The aims of this study were to determine what cues are used by primary care dentists when making the decision to refer a suspicious lesion, and to investigate their recent referral behaviour.METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a postal questionnaire was undertaken in a major conurbation in South Yorkshire. The questionnaire was sent to all 95 practices in the area concerned. Primary care dentists were asked to score a range of cues on a five-point scale and list their top ten. Experience of referrals made in the last 12 months was also recorded.RESULTS: Forty-two questionnaires were returned (44.2%). The cues that primary care dentists 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' would initiate a referral were: 'fixed', 'smokes >20 cigarettes/day', 'indurated', 'ragged borders' and 'ulceration'. The most cited top-ten cues were 'ulcerated', 'fixed to underlying tissues', 'smoking' and 'indurated'. The median number of lesions referred was 0.77 per 1000 adult patients. Twenty-six dentists recorded their experience of 29 lesions. Of these, 17% had been found by the patient whereas 80% had been found at a routine dental examination. Seventy-nine per cent had been present for more than six weeks. Reasons for referral included atypical appearance (38%), ulceration (21%) and location (21%). Fifty-four per cent of primary care dentists described their relationship with secondary care as either 'good' or 'excellent'.CONCLUSIONS: The most cited cues related to established or advanced disease, not to 'red' and 'white' lesions, which the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend for early referral. Even allowing for the relatively poor response rate, this suggests that some small lesions of oral cancer are being missed.

KW - Adult

KW - Age Factors

KW - Alcohol Drinking

KW - Color

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Cues

KW - Dentists

KW - Early Detection of Cancer

KW - England

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Mouth Neoplasms

KW - Oral Ulcer

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Referral and Consultation

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Sex Factors

KW - Smoking

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1308/135576109786994631

DO - 10.1308/135576109786994631

M3 - Article

C2 - 19126347

VL - 16

SP - 13

EP - 18

JO - Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England

JF - Journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) - The Royal College of Surgeons of England

SN - 1355-7610

IS - 1

ER -