TY - GEN

T1 - Faith Seeking Understanding: A Reply to Radenovic’s ‘Philosophy of my Faith’

AU - Ellis, David

PY - 2021/12/1

Y1 - 2021/12/1

N2 - Ljiljana Radenovic’s “Philosophy of my Faith” (2021) makes the valuable point that for a philosophical account of religious belief to be satisfactory it must adequately address what it is like to have religious belief. The challenge, Radenovic notes, is that contemporary philosophical debates about religion are at times different to, or have no serious interest in, discussions about what it is like to believe. This division needs to be bridged, but I think that the way how Radenovic goes about doing so is unsuccessful. It is therefore only fitting, due to my support of the method but disagreement with the conclusion, to write a reply which follows suit—let us conduct our own meditation on religious belief and then compare our conclusions with Radenovic’s.

AB - Ljiljana Radenovic’s “Philosophy of my Faith” (2021) makes the valuable point that for a philosophical account of religious belief to be satisfactory it must adequately address what it is like to have religious belief. The challenge, Radenovic notes, is that contemporary philosophical debates about religion are at times different to, or have no serious interest in, discussions about what it is like to believe. This division needs to be bridged, but I think that the way how Radenovic goes about doing so is unsuccessful. It is therefore only fitting, due to my support of the method but disagreement with the conclusion, to write a reply which follows suit—let us conduct our own meditation on religious belief and then compare our conclusions with Radenovic’s.

KW - philosophy

KW - religion

KW - Wittgenstein

KW - belief-in

KW - belief-that

KW - faith

KW - God

KW - Hume

KW - Phillips

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

JF - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

SN - 2471-9560

ER -