Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Communications Earth and Environment, Cyfrol 4, Rhif 27, 27, 08.02.2023.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior.
AU - Bell, Andrew Reid
AU - Rakotonarivo, O. Sarobidy
AU - Bhargava, Apurva
AU - Duthie, A. Bradley
AU - Zhang, Wei
AU - Sargent, Rebecca
AU - Lewis, Amy R.
AU - Kipchumba, Adams
PY - 2023/2/8
Y1 - 2023/2/8
N2 - Paying resource users to preserve features of their environment could in theory better align production and conservation goals. We show, however, that across a range of conservation dilemmas, they might not. We conduct a synthesis of dynamic games experiments built around collective action dilemmas in conservation, played across Europe, Africa, and Asia. We find, across this range of dilemmas, that while payments can encourage pro-conservation behavior, they often fail to capitalize on the potential for jointly improving productive and environmental outcomes, highlighting the more nuanced challenge of reconciling livelihoods with conservation goals. We further find production (yield) and the joint production-environment product (i.e., a measure of agricultural production multiplied by a measure of pro-conservation practice) are better preserved in groups that are more educated, more gender diverse and that better represent women. We discuss how the design of incentive programs can better align livelihood and environment goals.
AB - Paying resource users to preserve features of their environment could in theory better align production and conservation goals. We show, however, that across a range of conservation dilemmas, they might not. We conduct a synthesis of dynamic games experiments built around collective action dilemmas in conservation, played across Europe, Africa, and Asia. We find, across this range of dilemmas, that while payments can encourage pro-conservation behavior, they often fail to capitalize on the potential for jointly improving productive and environmental outcomes, highlighting the more nuanced challenge of reconciling livelihoods with conservation goals. We further find production (yield) and the joint production-environment product (i.e., a measure of agricultural production multiplied by a measure of pro-conservation practice) are better preserved in groups that are more educated, more gender diverse and that better represent women. We discuss how the design of incentive programs can better align livelihood and environment goals.
U2 - 10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6
DO - 10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6
M3 - Article
VL - 4
JO - Communications Earth and Environment
JF - Communications Earth and Environment
SN - 2662-4435
IS - 27
M1 - 27
ER -