Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness. / Packheiser, Julian; Schmitz, Judith; Berretz, Gesa et al.
Yn: Scientific Reports, Cyfrol 10, Rhif 1, 14501, 02.09.2020.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Packheiser, J, Schmitz, J, Berretz, G, Carey, DP, Paracchini, S, Papadatou-Pastou, M & Ocklenburg, S 2020, 'Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness', Scientific Reports, cyfrol. 10, rhif 1, 14501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

APA

Packheiser, J., Schmitz, J., Berretz, G., Carey, D. P., Paracchini, S., Papadatou-Pastou, M., & Ocklenburg, S. (2020). Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Erthygl 14501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

CBE

Packheiser J, Schmitz J, Berretz G, Carey DP, Paracchini S, Papadatou-Pastou M, Ocklenburg S. 2020. Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness. Scientific Reports. 10(1):Article 14501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Packheiser J, Schmitz J, Berretz G, Carey DP, Paracchini S, Papadatou-Pastou M et al. Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness. Scientific Reports. 2020 Medi 2;10(1):14501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

Author

Packheiser, Julian ; Schmitz, Judith ; Berretz, Gesa et al. / Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness. Yn: Scientific Reports. 2020 ; Cyfrol 10, Rhif 1.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness

AU - Packheiser, Julian

AU - Schmitz, Judith

AU - Berretz, Gesa

AU - Carey, David P.

AU - Paracchini, Silvia

AU - Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta

AU - Ocklenburg, Sebastian

PY - 2020/9/2

Y1 - 2020/9/2

N2 - Human lateral preferences, such as handedness and footedness, have interested researchers for decades due to their pronounced asymmetries at the population level. While there are good estimates on the prevalence of handedness in the population, there is no large-scale estimation on the prevalence of footedness. Furthermore, the relationship between footedness and handedness still remains elusive. Here, we conducted meta-analyses with four different classification systems for footedness on 145,135 individuals across 164 studies including new data from the ALSPAC cohort. The study aimed to determine a reliable point estimate of footedness, to study the association between footedness and handedness, and to investigate moderating factors influencing footedness. We showed that the prevalence of atypical footedness ranges between 12.10% using the most conservative criterion of left-footedness to 23.7% including all left- and mixed-footers as a single non-right category. As many as 60.1% of left-handers were left-footed whereas only 3.2% of right-handers were left-footed. Males were 4.1% more often non-right-footed compared to females. Individuals with psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders exhibited a higher prevalence of non-right-footedness. Furthermore, the presence of mixed-footedness was higher in children compared to adults and left-footedness was increased in athletes compared to the general population. Finally, we showed that footedness is only marginally influenced by cultural and social factors, which play a crucial role in the determination of handedness. Overall, this study provides new and useful reference data for laterality research. Furthermore, the data suggest that footedness is a valuable phenotype for the study of lateral motor biases, its underlying genetics and neurodevelopment.

AB - Human lateral preferences, such as handedness and footedness, have interested researchers for decades due to their pronounced asymmetries at the population level. While there are good estimates on the prevalence of handedness in the population, there is no large-scale estimation on the prevalence of footedness. Furthermore, the relationship between footedness and handedness still remains elusive. Here, we conducted meta-analyses with four different classification systems for footedness on 145,135 individuals across 164 studies including new data from the ALSPAC cohort. The study aimed to determine a reliable point estimate of footedness, to study the association between footedness and handedness, and to investigate moderating factors influencing footedness. We showed that the prevalence of atypical footedness ranges between 12.10% using the most conservative criterion of left-footedness to 23.7% including all left- and mixed-footers as a single non-right category. As many as 60.1% of left-handers were left-footed whereas only 3.2% of right-handers were left-footed. Males were 4.1% more often non-right-footed compared to females. Individuals with psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders exhibited a higher prevalence of non-right-footedness. Furthermore, the presence of mixed-footedness was higher in children compared to adults and left-footedness was increased in athletes compared to the general population. Finally, we showed that footedness is only marginally influenced by cultural and social factors, which play a crucial role in the determination of handedness. Overall, this study provides new and useful reference data for laterality research. Furthermore, the data suggest that footedness is a valuable phenotype for the study of lateral motor biases, its underlying genetics and neurodevelopment.

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

DO - 10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 14501

ER -