Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future?

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future? / Prescott, Craig; Pilato, Manuela; Bellia, Claudio.
Yn: Food Policy, Cyfrol 90, 101808, 01.2020.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Prescott, C, Pilato, M & Bellia, C 2020, 'Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future?', Food Policy, cyfrol. 90, 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101808

APA

Prescott, C., Pilato, M., & Bellia, C. (2020). Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future? Food Policy, 90, Erthygl 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101808

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Prescott C, Pilato M, Bellia C. Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future? Food Policy. 2020 Ion;90:101808. Epub 2019 Rhag 19. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101808

Author

Prescott, Craig ; Pilato, Manuela ; Bellia, Claudio. / Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future?. Yn: Food Policy. 2020 ; Cyfrol 90.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future?

AU - Prescott, Craig

AU - Pilato, Manuela

AU - Bellia, Claudio

N1 - 18 months embargo

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - The protection of geographical indications (‘GIs’) within the UK is placed into doubt by the UK’s withdrawalfrom the European Union (‘Brexit’). The default legal position is that after Brexit, there would be no legal provision for GIs in UK law. This default position can only be changed if the UK and the EU agree the terms of the UK’s withdrawal and then their future relationship. The article considers the implications of the draft withdrawal agreement which, inter alia ensures the continuing reciprocal protection of UK and EU GIs. In July 2019, a new UK Prime Minister took office, and renegotiated the draft withdrawal agreement, which retained the reciprocal protection of GIs. The ratification of this renegotiated withdrawal agreement depends on the result of the December 2019 general election. Under the withdrawal agreement GIs from outside the EU are not protected. Consequently, the article considers how UK GIs will continue to be protected in countries that have concluded a free trade agreement with the EU, by examining the rollover agreements that the UK Government are concluding around the world. Finally, given the intention of the UK Government that, post-Brexit, the UK will conclude free trade agreements with countries that have traditionally been reluctant to recognise GIs, such as the USA and Australia, the article examines the prospects for GI protection to be included in these agreements.

AB - The protection of geographical indications (‘GIs’) within the UK is placed into doubt by the UK’s withdrawalfrom the European Union (‘Brexit’). The default legal position is that after Brexit, there would be no legal provision for GIs in UK law. This default position can only be changed if the UK and the EU agree the terms of the UK’s withdrawal and then their future relationship. The article considers the implications of the draft withdrawal agreement which, inter alia ensures the continuing reciprocal protection of UK and EU GIs. In July 2019, a new UK Prime Minister took office, and renegotiated the draft withdrawal agreement, which retained the reciprocal protection of GIs. The ratification of this renegotiated withdrawal agreement depends on the result of the December 2019 general election. Under the withdrawal agreement GIs from outside the EU are not protected. Consequently, the article considers how UK GIs will continue to be protected in countries that have concluded a free trade agreement with the EU, by examining the rollover agreements that the UK Government are concluding around the world. Finally, given the intention of the UK Government that, post-Brexit, the UK will conclude free trade agreements with countries that have traditionally been reluctant to recognise GIs, such as the USA and Australia, the article examines the prospects for GI protection to be included in these agreements.

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101808

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101808

M3 - Article

VL - 90

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

M1 - 101808

ER -