TY - JOUR

T1 - High-level language processing regions are not engaged in action observation or imitation

AU - Pritchett, Brianna L

AU - Hoeflin, Caitlyn

AU - Koldewyn, Kami

AU - Dechter, Eyal

AU - Fedorenko, Evelina

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - A set of left frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions respond robustly during language comprehension and production (e.g., Fedorenko et al. 2010; Menenti et al. 2011). These regions have been further shown to be selective for language relative to other cognitive processes, including arithmetic, aspects of executive function, and music perception (e.g., Fedorenko et al. 2011; Monti et al. 2012). However, one claim about overlap between language and non-linguistic cognition remains prominent. In particular, some have argued that language processing shares computational demands with action observation and/or execution (e.g., Rizzolatti and Arbib 1998; Koechlin and Jubault 2006; Tettamanti and Weniger 2006). However, the evidence for these claims is indirect, based on observing activation for language and action tasks within the same broad anatomical areas (e.g., on the lateral surface of the left frontal lobe). To test whether language indeed shares machinery with action observation/execution, we examined the responses of language brain regions, defined functionally in each individual participant (Fedorenko et al. 2010), to action observation (Experiments 1, 2, 3a) and action imitation (Experiment 3b). With the exception of the language region in the angular gyrus, all language regions, including those in the inferior frontal gyrus (within "Broca's area"), showed little or no response during action observation/imitation. These results add to the growing body of literature suggesting that high-level language regions are highly selective for language processing (see Fedorenko and Varley 2016 for a review).

AB - A set of left frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions respond robustly during language comprehension and production (e.g., Fedorenko et al. 2010; Menenti et al. 2011). These regions have been further shown to be selective for language relative to other cognitive processes, including arithmetic, aspects of executive function, and music perception (e.g., Fedorenko et al. 2011; Monti et al. 2012). However, one claim about overlap between language and non-linguistic cognition remains prominent. In particular, some have argued that language processing shares computational demands with action observation and/or execution (e.g., Rizzolatti and Arbib 1998; Koechlin and Jubault 2006; Tettamanti and Weniger 2006). However, the evidence for these claims is indirect, based on observing activation for language and action tasks within the same broad anatomical areas (e.g., on the lateral surface of the left frontal lobe). To test whether language indeed shares machinery with action observation/execution, we examined the responses of language brain regions, defined functionally in each individual participant (Fedorenko et al. 2010), to action observation (Experiments 1, 2, 3a) and action imitation (Experiment 3b). With the exception of the language region in the angular gyrus, all language regions, including those in the inferior frontal gyrus (within "Broca's area"), showed little or no response during action observation/imitation. These results add to the growing body of literature suggesting that high-level language regions are highly selective for language processing (see Fedorenko and Varley 2016 for a review).

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00222.2018

DO - 10.1152/jn.00222.2018

M3 - Article

C2 - 30156457

VL - 120

SP - 2555

EP - 2570

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 5

ER -