Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans. / Carr, Jay M J R; Hoiland, Ryan L; Caldwell, Hannah G et al.
Yn: Journal of Physiology, Cyfrol 598, Rhif 23, 12.2020, t. 5333-5350.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Carr, JMJR, Hoiland, RL, Caldwell, HG, Coombs, GB, Howe, CA, Tremblay, JC, Green, DJ & Ainslie, PN 2020, 'Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans', Journal of Physiology, cyfrol. 598, rhif 23, tt. 5333-5350. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280369

APA

Carr, J. M. J. R., Hoiland, R. L., Caldwell, H. G., Coombs, G. B., Howe, C. A., Tremblay, J. C., Green, D. J., & Ainslie, P. N. (2020). Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans. Journal of Physiology, 598(23), 5333-5350. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280369

CBE

Carr JMJR, Hoiland RL, Caldwell HG, Coombs GB, Howe CA, Tremblay JC, Green DJ, Ainslie PN. 2020. Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans. Journal of Physiology. 598(23):5333-5350. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280369

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Carr JMJR, Hoiland RL, Caldwell HG, Coombs GB, Howe CA, Tremblay JC et al. Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans. Journal of Physiology. 2020 Rhag;598(23):5333-5350. doi: 10.1113/JP280369

Author

Carr, Jay M J R ; Hoiland, Ryan L ; Caldwell, Hannah G et al. / Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans. Yn: Journal of Physiology. 2020 ; Cyfrol 598, Rhif 23. tt. 5333-5350.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internal carotid and brachial artery shear-dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans

AU - Carr, Jay M J R

AU - Hoiland, Ryan L

AU - Caldwell, Hannah G

AU - Coombs, Geoff B

AU - Howe, Connor A

AU - Tremblay, Joshua C

AU - Green, Daniel J

AU - Ainslie, Philip N

N1 - © 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2020 The Physiological Society.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - KEY POINTS: Brachial artery (BA) shear-mediated dilatation is a widely used assessment of vascular function with links to coronary artery health and cardiovascular risk. Cerebral vascular health is often interrogated using cerebrovascular (middle cerebral artery velocity) reactivity to carbon dioxide. We show that endothelium-dependent diameter (dilator) responses are not significantly related between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and BA; nor are endothelium-independent responses. Additionally, ICA endothelium-dependent responses are not related to middle cerebral artery velocity or ICA blood flow reactivity responses to carbon dioxide. Therefore, assessment of large extracranial cerebral artery vascular health should be quantified via methods specific to the vessel, not via peripheral endothelial function or cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide.ABSTRACT: This study compared internal carotid artery (ICA) and brachial artery (BA) endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. We hypothesized that endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the ICA and BA would be neither similar in magnitude nor correlated between vessels. In 19 healthy adults (23 ± 6 years, 24 ± 3 kg/m2 , six female), endothelium-dependent dilatation in the ICA was determined via Duplex ultrasound during transiently elevated shear stress caused by increased partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide using dynamic end-tidal forcing (+9 mmHg; cerebral flow-mediated dilatation, cFMD). BA endothelium-dependent dilatation was assessed via standard flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Endothelium-independent dilatation in the ICA and BA was assessed concurrently for 10 min following administration of 400 µg sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the ICA (3.4 ± 2.4%) was lower than (P = 0.013) and not correlated to that of the BA (7.9 ± 3.3%; r2 = 0.00, P = 0.93). Including baseline diameter and shear-rate area under the curve as covariates maintained the difference between cFMD and FMD (3.3 ± 4.2% vs. 7.8 ± 3.8%, P = 0.03), while including baseline diameter and baseline shear rate-adjusted area under the curve as covariates abolished it (5.9 ± 3.7% vs. 5.9.8 ± 3.5%, P = 0.99). GTN-mediated vasodilation of the ICA (14.3 ± 2.9%) was lower than (P = 0.002) and not correlated to that of the BA (25.5 ± 8.8%; r2 = 0.12, P = 0.19). Adjusting for baseline diameter eliminated the differences in GTN-induced vasodilation (ICA: 20.1 ± 5.8% vs. BA: 20.4 ± 5.5%; P = 0.93). Differences in endothelium-dependent responses, and the lack of correlations between arteries, indicates that endothelium-dependent function cannot be assumed to be related across cerebral and peripheral vasculatures in young, healthy humans.

AB - KEY POINTS: Brachial artery (BA) shear-mediated dilatation is a widely used assessment of vascular function with links to coronary artery health and cardiovascular risk. Cerebral vascular health is often interrogated using cerebrovascular (middle cerebral artery velocity) reactivity to carbon dioxide. We show that endothelium-dependent diameter (dilator) responses are not significantly related between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and BA; nor are endothelium-independent responses. Additionally, ICA endothelium-dependent responses are not related to middle cerebral artery velocity or ICA blood flow reactivity responses to carbon dioxide. Therefore, assessment of large extracranial cerebral artery vascular health should be quantified via methods specific to the vessel, not via peripheral endothelial function or cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide.ABSTRACT: This study compared internal carotid artery (ICA) and brachial artery (BA) endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. We hypothesized that endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the ICA and BA would be neither similar in magnitude nor correlated between vessels. In 19 healthy adults (23 ± 6 years, 24 ± 3 kg/m2 , six female), endothelium-dependent dilatation in the ICA was determined via Duplex ultrasound during transiently elevated shear stress caused by increased partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide using dynamic end-tidal forcing (+9 mmHg; cerebral flow-mediated dilatation, cFMD). BA endothelium-dependent dilatation was assessed via standard flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Endothelium-independent dilatation in the ICA and BA was assessed concurrently for 10 min following administration of 400 µg sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the ICA (3.4 ± 2.4%) was lower than (P = 0.013) and not correlated to that of the BA (7.9 ± 3.3%; r2 = 0.00, P = 0.93). Including baseline diameter and shear-rate area under the curve as covariates maintained the difference between cFMD and FMD (3.3 ± 4.2% vs. 7.8 ± 3.8%, P = 0.03), while including baseline diameter and baseline shear rate-adjusted area under the curve as covariates abolished it (5.9 ± 3.7% vs. 5.9.8 ± 3.5%, P = 0.99). GTN-mediated vasodilation of the ICA (14.3 ± 2.9%) was lower than (P = 0.002) and not correlated to that of the BA (25.5 ± 8.8%; r2 = 0.12, P = 0.19). Adjusting for baseline diameter eliminated the differences in GTN-induced vasodilation (ICA: 20.1 ± 5.8% vs. BA: 20.4 ± 5.5%; P = 0.93). Differences in endothelium-dependent responses, and the lack of correlations between arteries, indicates that endothelium-dependent function cannot be assumed to be related across cerebral and peripheral vasculatures in young, healthy humans.

KW - Adult

KW - Blood Flow Velocity

KW - Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging

KW - Endothelium, Vascular

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Nitroglycerin/pharmacology

KW - Regional Blood Flow

KW - Vasodilation

KW - Vasodilator Agents/pharmacology

U2 - 10.1113/JP280369

DO - 10.1113/JP280369

M3 - Article

C2 - 32901919

VL - 598

SP - 5333

EP - 5350

JO - Journal of Physiology

JF - Journal of Physiology

SN - 0022-3751

IS - 23

ER -