Liberale Briten? Fundregelsysteme im Vergleich
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall
StandardStandard
49 t. Archäologische Denkmalpflege. 2019Blog. (Archäologische Denkmalpflege; Cyfrol 2).
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Liberale Briten?
T2 - Fundregelsysteme im Vergleich
AU - Karl, Raimund
PY - 2019/12/10
Y1 - 2019/12/10
N2 - A recently widely reported on judgement on theft of archaeological finds from Hereford has created quite a lot of heated debate among archaeologists and metal detectorists, not least because the main culprit was sentences to 10 years in jail. This is incompatible with the widely held misconception in germanophone archaeology that the English and Welsh system of regulating archaeological finds is particularly liberal and ineffective compared to equivalent germanophone systems. In this contribution, I compare the English and Welsh finds regulation system with its German and Austrian equivalents and demonstrate, that the significant difference between them is not their relative liberality or restrictivity, but that the former has taken a pragmatic, while the latter ones are taking an idealistic, but utterly unrealistic approach to regulating this matter. As a consequence, not only is the English and Welsh system extremely far ahead of the German and Austrian ones where the number of finds reports received is concerned, but also much more effective at preventing damage to protected scheduled monuments and where punishing theft of archaeological finds subject to treasure trove regulations.
AB - A recently widely reported on judgement on theft of archaeological finds from Hereford has created quite a lot of heated debate among archaeologists and metal detectorists, not least because the main culprit was sentences to 10 years in jail. This is incompatible with the widely held misconception in germanophone archaeology that the English and Welsh system of regulating archaeological finds is particularly liberal and ineffective compared to equivalent germanophone systems. In this contribution, I compare the English and Welsh finds regulation system with its German and Austrian equivalents and demonstrate, that the significant difference between them is not their relative liberality or restrictivity, but that the former has taken a pragmatic, while the latter ones are taking an idealistic, but utterly unrealistic approach to regulating this matter. As a consequence, not only is the English and Welsh system extremely far ahead of the German and Austrian ones where the number of finds reports received is concerned, but also much more effective at preventing damage to protected scheduled monuments and where punishing theft of archaeological finds subject to treasure trove regulations.
KW - ARCHAEOLOGY
KW - Heritage
KW - Heritage law
KW - Heritage management
KW - Austria
KW - Germany
KW - England and Wales
M3 - Cyfraniad Arall
SN - 978-3-7502-6696-4
T3 - Archäologische Denkmalpflege
PB - Archäologische Denkmalpflege
ER -