MEDEX 2015: Prophylactic effects of positive expiratory pressure in trekkers at very high altitude.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Frontiers in Physiology, Cyfrol 12, 710622, 21.09.2021.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - MEDEX 2015: Prophylactic effects of positive expiratory pressure in trekkers at very high altitude.
AU - Rupp, Thomas
AU - Maufrais, Claire
AU - Walther, Guillaume
AU - Esteve, Francois
AU - Macdonald, Jamie
AU - Bouzat, Pierre
AU - Verges, Samuel
N1 - Copyright © 2021 Rupp, Maufrais, Walther, Esteve, Macdonald, Bouzat and Verges.
PY - 2021/9/21
Y1 - 2021/9/21
N2 - Purpose: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) breathing has been shown to increase arterial oxygenation during acute hypoxic exposure but the underlying mechanisms and consequences on symptoms during prolonged high-altitude exposure remain to be elucidated. Methods: Twenty-four males (41 ± 16 years) were investigated, at sea level and at 5,085 m after 18 days of trekking from 570 m. Participants breathed through a face-mask with PEP = 0 cmH 2O (PEP 0, 0-45 th min) and with PEP = 10 cmH 2O (PEP 10, 46-90 th min). Arterial (SpO 2), quadriceps and prefrontal (near infrared spectroscopy) oxygenation was measured continuously. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler), cardiac function (2D-echocardiography), extravascular lung water accumulation (UsLC, thoracic ultrasound lung comets) and acute mountain sickness (Lake Louise score, LLS) were assessed during PEP 0 and PEP 10. Results: At 5,085 m with PEP 0, SpO 2 was 78 ± 4%, UsLC was 8 ± 5 (a.u.) and the LLS was 2.3 ± 1.7 (all P < 0.05 versus sea level). At 5,085 m, PEP 10 increased significantly SpO 2 (+9 ± 5%), quadriceps (+2 ± 2%) and prefrontal cortex (+2 ± 2%) oxygenation ( P < 0.05), and decreased significantly MCAv (-16 ± 14 cm.s -1) and cardiac output (-0.7 ± 1.2 L.min -1) together with a reduced stroke volume (-9 ± 15 mL, all P < 0.05) and no systemic hypotension. PEP 10 decreased slightly the number of UsLC (-1.4 ± 2.7, P = 0.04) while the incidence of acute mountain sickness (LLS ≥ 3) fell from 42% with PEP 0 to 25% after PEP 10 ( P = 0.043). Conclusion: PEP 10 breathing improved arterial and tissue oxygenation and symptoms of acute mountain sickness after trekking to very high altitude, despite reduced cerebral perfusion and cardiac output. Further studies are required to establish whether PEP-breathing prophylactic mechanisms also occur in participants with more severe acute mountain sickness.
AB - Purpose: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) breathing has been shown to increase arterial oxygenation during acute hypoxic exposure but the underlying mechanisms and consequences on symptoms during prolonged high-altitude exposure remain to be elucidated. Methods: Twenty-four males (41 ± 16 years) were investigated, at sea level and at 5,085 m after 18 days of trekking from 570 m. Participants breathed through a face-mask with PEP = 0 cmH 2O (PEP 0, 0-45 th min) and with PEP = 10 cmH 2O (PEP 10, 46-90 th min). Arterial (SpO 2), quadriceps and prefrontal (near infrared spectroscopy) oxygenation was measured continuously. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler), cardiac function (2D-echocardiography), extravascular lung water accumulation (UsLC, thoracic ultrasound lung comets) and acute mountain sickness (Lake Louise score, LLS) were assessed during PEP 0 and PEP 10. Results: At 5,085 m with PEP 0, SpO 2 was 78 ± 4%, UsLC was 8 ± 5 (a.u.) and the LLS was 2.3 ± 1.7 (all P < 0.05 versus sea level). At 5,085 m, PEP 10 increased significantly SpO 2 (+9 ± 5%), quadriceps (+2 ± 2%) and prefrontal cortex (+2 ± 2%) oxygenation ( P < 0.05), and decreased significantly MCAv (-16 ± 14 cm.s -1) and cardiac output (-0.7 ± 1.2 L.min -1) together with a reduced stroke volume (-9 ± 15 mL, all P < 0.05) and no systemic hypotension. PEP 10 decreased slightly the number of UsLC (-1.4 ± 2.7, P = 0.04) while the incidence of acute mountain sickness (LLS ≥ 3) fell from 42% with PEP 0 to 25% after PEP 10 ( P = 0.043). Conclusion: PEP 10 breathing improved arterial and tissue oxygenation and symptoms of acute mountain sickness after trekking to very high altitude, despite reduced cerebral perfusion and cardiac output. Further studies are required to establish whether PEP-breathing prophylactic mechanisms also occur in participants with more severe acute mountain sickness.
KW - altitude illness
KW - cardiac function
KW - cerebral perfusion
KW - PEP breathing
KW - tissue oxygeneration
KW - extreme environmentqMedical expedition
KW - hypoxia
U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2021.710622
DO - 10.3389/fphys.2021.710622
M3 - Article
C2 - 34621182
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Physiology
JF - Frontiers in Physiology
SN - 1664-042X
M1 - 710622
ER -