Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals. / Melvin, Zoe; Dhirani, Hussein; Mitchell, Christopher et al.
Yn: Ecology and Evolution, Cyfrol 12, Rhif 7, e9115, 17.07.2022.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Melvin, Z, Dhirani, H, Mitchell, C, Davenport, T, Blount, J & Georgiev, AV 2022, 'Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals', Ecology and Evolution, cyfrol. 12, rhif 7, e9115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9115

APA

Melvin, Z., Dhirani, H., Mitchell, C., Davenport, T., Blount, J., & Georgiev, A. V. (2022). Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals. Ecology and Evolution, 12(7), Erthygl e9115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9115

CBE

Melvin Z, Dhirani H, Mitchell C, Davenport T, Blount J, Georgiev AV. 2022. Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals. Ecology and Evolution. 12(7):Article e9115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9115

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Melvin Z, Dhirani H, Mitchell C, Davenport T, Blount J, Georgiev AV. Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals. Ecology and Evolution. 2022 Gor 17;12(7):e9115. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9115

Author

Melvin, Zoe ; Dhirani, Hussein ; Mitchell, Christopher et al. / Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals. Yn: Ecology and Evolution. 2022 ; Cyfrol 12, Rhif 7.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals

AU - Melvin, Zoe

AU - Dhirani, Hussein

AU - Mitchell, Christopher

AU - Davenport, Tim

AU - Blount, Jonathan

AU - Georgiev, Alexander V.

N1 - Research Funding International Primatological Society Bangor University Royal Society Primate Conservation Natural Environment Research Council. Grant Number: NE/L002604/1

PY - 2022/7/17

Y1 - 2022/7/17

N2 - Biomarkers of oxidative stress (OS) are useful in addressing a wide range of research questions, but thus far, they have had limited application to wild mammal populations due to a reliance on blood or tissue sampling. A shift toward non-invasive measurement of OS would allow field ecologists and conservationists to apply this method more readily. However, the impact of methodological confounds on urinary OS measurement under field conditions has never been explicitly investigated. We combined a cross-sectional analysis with a field experiment to assess the impact of four potential methodological confounds on OS measurements: (1) time of sampling, (2) environmental contamination from foliage; (3) delay between sample collection and flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen; and (4) sample storage of up to 15 months below −80°C. We measured DNA oxidative damage (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, 8-OHdG), lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and uric acid (UA) in 167 urine samples collected from wild Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii). We found that MDA was higher in samples collected in the morning than in the afternoon but there were no diurnal patterns in any of the other markers. Contamination of samples from foliage and length of time frozen at −80°C for up to 15 months did not affect OS marker concentrations. Freezing delay did not affect OS levels cross-sectionally, but OS values from individual samples showed only moderate-to-good consistency and substantial rank-order reversals when exposed to different freezing delays. We recommend that diurnal patterns of OS markers and the impact of storage time before and after freezing on OS marker concentrations be considered when designing sampling protocols. However, given the high stability we observed for four OS markers subject to a variety of putative methodological confounds, we suggest that urinary OS markers provide a valuable addition to the toolkit of field ecologists and conservationists within reasonable methodological constraints.

AB - Biomarkers of oxidative stress (OS) are useful in addressing a wide range of research questions, but thus far, they have had limited application to wild mammal populations due to a reliance on blood or tissue sampling. A shift toward non-invasive measurement of OS would allow field ecologists and conservationists to apply this method more readily. However, the impact of methodological confounds on urinary OS measurement under field conditions has never been explicitly investigated. We combined a cross-sectional analysis with a field experiment to assess the impact of four potential methodological confounds on OS measurements: (1) time of sampling, (2) environmental contamination from foliage; (3) delay between sample collection and flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen; and (4) sample storage of up to 15 months below −80°C. We measured DNA oxidative damage (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, 8-OHdG), lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and uric acid (UA) in 167 urine samples collected from wild Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii). We found that MDA was higher in samples collected in the morning than in the afternoon but there were no diurnal patterns in any of the other markers. Contamination of samples from foliage and length of time frozen at −80°C for up to 15 months did not affect OS marker concentrations. Freezing delay did not affect OS levels cross-sectionally, but OS values from individual samples showed only moderate-to-good consistency and substantial rank-order reversals when exposed to different freezing delays. We recommend that diurnal patterns of OS markers and the impact of storage time before and after freezing on OS marker concentrations be considered when designing sampling protocols. However, given the high stability we observed for four OS markers subject to a variety of putative methodological confounds, we suggest that urinary OS markers provide a valuable addition to the toolkit of field ecologists and conservationists within reasonable methodological constraints.

KW - 8-oxodG

KW - DNA damage

KW - Zanzibar red colobus

KW - ecophysiology

KW - lipid peroxidation

KW - non-invasive sampling

KW - oxidative stress

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.9115

DO - 10.1002/ece3.9115

M3 - Article

C2 - 35866020

VL - 12

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 7

M1 - e9115

ER -