Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration? / Tugwell-Allsup, Jenna Ruth; Morris, Rhys Wyn; Thomas, Kate et al.
Yn: British Journal of Radiology, Cyfrol 95, Rhif 1130, 20211026, 01.02.2022.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Tugwell-Allsup, JR, Morris, RW, Thomas, K, Hibbs, R & England, A 2022, 'Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?', British Journal of Radiology, cyfrol. 95, rhif 1130, 20211026. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211026

APA

Tugwell-Allsup, J. R., Morris, R. W., Thomas, K., Hibbs, R., & England, A. (2022). Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration? British Journal of Radiology, 95(1130), Erthygl 20211026. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211026

CBE

Tugwell-Allsup JR, Morris RW, Thomas K, Hibbs R, England A. 2022. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?. British Journal of Radiology. 95(1130):Article 20211026. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211026

MLA

Tugwell-Allsup, Jenna Ruth et al. "Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?". British Journal of Radiology. 2022. 95(1130). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211026

VancouverVancouver

Tugwell-Allsup JR, Morris RW, Thomas K, Hibbs R, England A. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration? British Journal of Radiology. 2022 Chw 1;95(1130):20211026. Epub 2021 Rhag 14. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211026

Author

Tugwell-Allsup, Jenna Ruth ; Morris, Rhys Wyn ; Thomas, Kate et al. / Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?. Yn: British Journal of Radiology. 2022 ; Cyfrol 95, Rhif 1130.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

AU - Tugwell-Allsup, Jenna Ruth

AU - Morris, Rhys Wyn

AU - Thomas, Kate

AU - Hibbs, Richard

AU - England, Andrew

PY - 2022/2/1

Y1 - 2022/2/1

N2 - Objectives: Copper filtration removes lower energy X-ray photons, which do not enhance image quality but would otherwise contribute to patient radiation dose. This study explores the use of additional copper filtration for neonatal mobile chest imaging. Methods: A controlled factorial-designed experiment was used to determine the effect of independent variables on image quality and radiation dose. These variables included: copper filtration (0 Cu, 0.1 Cu and 0.2 Cu), exposure factors, source-to-image distance and image receptor position (direct / tray). Image quality was evaluated using absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and entrance surface dose (ESD) was derived using an ionising chamber within the central X-ray beam. Results: VGA, CNR and ESD significantly reduced (p < 0.01) when using added copper filtration. For 0.1 Cu, the percentage reduction was much greater for ESD (60%) than for VGA (14%) and CNR (20%), respectively. When compared to the optimal combinations of parameters for incubator imaging using no copper filtration, an increase in kV and mAs when using 0.1-mm Cu resulted in better image quality at the same radiation dose (direct) or, equal image quality at reduced dose (in-tray). The use of 0.1-mm Cu for neonatal chest imaging with a corresponding increase in kV and mAs is therefore recommended. Conclusion: Using additional copper filtration significantly reduces radiation dose (at increased mAs) without a detrimental effect on image quality. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study, using an anthropomorphic phantom, to explore the use of additional Cu for digital radiography neonatal chest imaging and therefore helps inform practice to standardise and optimise this imaging examination.

AB - Objectives: Copper filtration removes lower energy X-ray photons, which do not enhance image quality but would otherwise contribute to patient radiation dose. This study explores the use of additional copper filtration for neonatal mobile chest imaging. Methods: A controlled factorial-designed experiment was used to determine the effect of independent variables on image quality and radiation dose. These variables included: copper filtration (0 Cu, 0.1 Cu and 0.2 Cu), exposure factors, source-to-image distance and image receptor position (direct / tray). Image quality was evaluated using absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and entrance surface dose (ESD) was derived using an ionising chamber within the central X-ray beam. Results: VGA, CNR and ESD significantly reduced (p < 0.01) when using added copper filtration. For 0.1 Cu, the percentage reduction was much greater for ESD (60%) than for VGA (14%) and CNR (20%), respectively. When compared to the optimal combinations of parameters for incubator imaging using no copper filtration, an increase in kV and mAs when using 0.1-mm Cu resulted in better image quality at the same radiation dose (direct) or, equal image quality at reduced dose (in-tray). The use of 0.1-mm Cu for neonatal chest imaging with a corresponding increase in kV and mAs is therefore recommended. Conclusion: Using additional copper filtration significantly reduces radiation dose (at increased mAs) without a detrimental effect on image quality. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study, using an anthropomorphic phantom, to explore the use of additional Cu for digital radiography neonatal chest imaging and therefore helps inform practice to standardise and optimise this imaging examination.

U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20211026

DO - 10.1259/bjr.20211026

M3 - Article

C2 - 34797726

VL - 95

JO - British Journal of Radiology

JF - British Journal of Radiology

SN - 0007-1285

IS - 1130

M1 - 20211026

ER -