Nothing unfortunate about disagreements in sport self-talk research: Reply to Van Raalte, Vincent, Dickens, and Brewer (2019).
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, Cyfrol 8, Rhif 4, 11.2019, t. 379-386.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Nothing unfortunate about disagreements in sport self-talk research: Reply to Van Raalte, Vincent, Dickens, and Brewer (2019).
AU - Latinjak, Alexander T.
AU - Comoutos, Nikos
AU - Hardy, James
AU - Hatzigeorgiadis, Antonis
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Replies to comments by Judy L. Van Raalet et al. (see record 2019-61601-001) on the article by Alexander T. Latinjak et al. (see record 2019-10558-001). Van Raalte et al. expressed their concerns about (a) the conceptual approach and the proposed “common language” for the discussion of self-talk; (b) the limited benefits of how our approach, which focuses on taxonomy and categorization, could serve as a guide for future research; and (c) the validity of the self-talk assessment in sports self-talk literature (a topic we note was outside of our original article). In reply, Latinjak et al. look at the overarching criticisms to provide a balanced perspective on each of them and, when appropriate, clarify out their own stance on the matter.
AB - Replies to comments by Judy L. Van Raalet et al. (see record 2019-61601-001) on the article by Alexander T. Latinjak et al. (see record 2019-10558-001). Van Raalte et al. expressed their concerns about (a) the conceptual approach and the proposed “common language” for the discussion of self-talk; (b) the limited benefits of how our approach, which focuses on taxonomy and categorization, could serve as a guide for future research; and (c) the validity of the self-talk assessment in sports self-talk literature (a topic we note was outside of our original article). In reply, Latinjak et al. look at the overarching criticisms to provide a balanced perspective on each of them and, when appropriate, clarify out their own stance on the matter.
U2 - 10.1037/spy0000184
DO - 10.1037/spy0000184
M3 - Article
VL - 8
SP - 379
EP - 386
JO - Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
JF - Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
SN - 2157-3905
IS - 4
ER -