Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis. / MacLeod, Kirsty; Monestier, Chloé; Ferrari, Maud et al.
Yn: Oecologia, Cyfrol 200, Rhif 3-4, 01.12.2022, t. 371-383.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

MacLeod, K, Monestier, C, Ferrari, M, McGhee, K, Sheriff, M & Bell, A 2022, 'Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis', Oecologia, cyfrol. 200, rhif 3-4, tt. 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w

APA

MacLeod, K., Monestier, C., Ferrari, M., McGhee, K., Sheriff, M., & Bell, A. (2022). Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis. Oecologia, 200(3-4), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w

CBE

MacLeod K, Monestier C, Ferrari M, McGhee K, Sheriff M, Bell A. 2022. Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis. Oecologia. 200(3-4):371-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w

MLA

VancouverVancouver

MacLeod K, Monestier C, Ferrari M, McGhee K, Sheriff M, Bell A. Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis. Oecologia. 2022 Rhag 1;200(3-4):371-383. Epub 2022 Tach 1. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w

Author

MacLeod, Kirsty ; Monestier, Chloé ; Ferrari, Maud et al. / Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis. Yn: Oecologia. 2022 ; Cyfrol 200, Rhif 3-4. tt. 371-383.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis

AU - MacLeod, Kirsty

AU - Monestier, Chloé

AU - Ferrari, Maud

AU - McGhee, Katie

AU - Sheriff, Michael

AU - Bell, Alison

N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - There is growing evidence that the environment experienced by one generation can influence phenotypes in the next generation via transgenerational plasticity (TGP). One of the best-studied examples of TGP in animals is predator-induced transgenerational plasticity, whereby exposing parents to predation risk triggers changes in offspring phenotypes. Yet, there is a lack of general consensus synthesizing the predator–prey literature with existing theory pertaining to ecology and evolution of TGP. Here, we apply a meta-analysis to the sizable literature on predator-induced TGP (441 effect sizes from 29 species and 49 studies) to explore five hypotheses about the magnitude, form and direction of predator-induced TGP. Hypothesis #1: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with the number of predator cues. Hypothesis #2: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with reproductive mode. Hypothesis #3: the strength and direction of predator-induced TGP should vary among offspring phenotypic traits because some traits are more plastic than others. Hypothesis #4: the strength of predator-induced TGP should wane over ontogeny. Hypothesis #5: predator-induced TGP should generate adaptive phenotypes that should be more evident when offspring are themselves exposed to risk. We found strong evidence for predator-induced TGP overall, but no evidence that parental predator exposure causes offspring traits to change in a particular direction. Additionally, we found little evidence in support of any of the specific hypotheses. We infer that the failure to find consistent evidence reflects the heterogeneous nature of the phenomena, and the highly diverse experimental designs used to study it. Together, these findings set an agenda for future work in this area.

AB - There is growing evidence that the environment experienced by one generation can influence phenotypes in the next generation via transgenerational plasticity (TGP). One of the best-studied examples of TGP in animals is predator-induced transgenerational plasticity, whereby exposing parents to predation risk triggers changes in offspring phenotypes. Yet, there is a lack of general consensus synthesizing the predator–prey literature with existing theory pertaining to ecology and evolution of TGP. Here, we apply a meta-analysis to the sizable literature on predator-induced TGP (441 effect sizes from 29 species and 49 studies) to explore five hypotheses about the magnitude, form and direction of predator-induced TGP. Hypothesis #1: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with the number of predator cues. Hypothesis #2: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with reproductive mode. Hypothesis #3: the strength and direction of predator-induced TGP should vary among offspring phenotypic traits because some traits are more plastic than others. Hypothesis #4: the strength of predator-induced TGP should wane over ontogeny. Hypothesis #5: predator-induced TGP should generate adaptive phenotypes that should be more evident when offspring are themselves exposed to risk. We found strong evidence for predator-induced TGP overall, but no evidence that parental predator exposure causes offspring traits to change in a particular direction. Additionally, we found little evidence in support of any of the specific hypotheses. We infer that the failure to find consistent evidence reflects the heterogeneous nature of the phenomena, and the highly diverse experimental designs used to study it. Together, these findings set an agenda for future work in this area.

KW - Developmental plasticity

KW - Intergenerational inheritance

KW - Maternal effect

KW - Parental effect

KW - Predation

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w

DO - 10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w

M3 - Article

C2 - 36319867

VL - 200

SP - 371

EP - 383

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

IS - 3-4

ER -